Preview

Humanities and law research

Advanced search

SPECIFIC FEATURES OF WORK AMONG THE WOMEN POPULATION IN THE ETHNIC ENVIRONMENT ON THE DON, KUBAN AND STAVROPOL REGION IN 1920–1930s

https://doi.org/10.37493/2409-1030.2021.2.1

Abstract

The article analyzes the problem of organizing work among the female population in the ethnic environment in the Don, Kuban and Stavropol regions. In modern historiography, in the study of women’s issue in the South Russian macroregion in the 1920s-1930s the main attention is paid to the national autonomies of the North Caucasus, while the ethnic minorities living outside them (dispersed ethnic groups) still remain outside research attention. The relevance of studying the experience of work among the female part of the population of these ethnic communities, scattered throughout the South of Russia, is due to the fact that it allows us to highlight many issues of state policy in a dispersed ethnic environment from a new angle. It is emphasized that the work among the representatives of ethnic minorities had a double dimension, being part of the women’s issue in the Soviet state and an integral part of national policy. On the basis of a wide range of archival documents, the main tasks, directions and mechanisms of women’s work in an ethnic environment have been identified. The study shows its specificity and features of the Don, Kuban and Stavropol Territories as a sub-region of the South of Russia, or the South-East in the terminology of the 1920-1930s. The system and structure of the leadership of women’s work at the all-Union and regional levels has been reconstructed, including the key role of party bodies in this process. The factors that made it difficult for the female population to work were identified, taking into account the dispersed nature of the settlement of ethnic minorities in the Don, Kuban and Stavropol regions, the peculiarities of their social, cultural and economic development. The mechanisms that compensated for the shortcomings of female work among ethnic groups in the specified region have been identified. 

About the Author

A. V. Averyanov
Southern Federal University
Russian Federation

PHd in history, Associate Professor, Chair of Russian history in XX–XXI, Institute of History and International Relations,

Rostov-on-Don



References

1. Akopyan V.Z. Kratkii ocherk po istorii nemtsev Severnogo Kavkaza (A brief essay on the history of the Germans of the North Caucasus). Pyatigorsk: PSLU publ., 2005. 60 p. (In Russian).

2. Bugai N.F. Kavkaz. Etnicheskie men’shinstva: proshloe i nastoiashchee (Caucasus. Ethnic minorities: the past and the present). Moscow: «Grif» and K Publ., 2014. 420 p. (In Russian).

3. Velikii Oktyabr’ i raskreposhchenie zhenshchin Severnogo Kavkaza i Zakavkaz’ya (1917-1936 gg.) (Great October and the emancipation of women in the North Caucasus and Transcaucasia (1917 – 1936). Moscow: Mysl’ publ., 1979. 370 p. (In Russian).

4. State archive of modern history of the Stavropol region (GANISK). F. - 5938. Inv. 1. D. 22. (In Russian).

5. State archive of the Rostov region (GARO). F.R. - 64. Inv. 3. D. 22. (In Russian).

6. GARO. F.R. - 1798. Inv. 1. D. 941. (In Russian).

7. GARO. F.R. - 1798. Inv. 1. D. 1116. (In Russian).

8. GARO. F.R. - 1798. Inv. 1. D. 1343. (In Russian).

9. GARO. F.R. - 1798. Inv. 1. D. 1399. (In Russian).

10. GARO. F.R. - 2713. Inv. 1. D. 29. (In Russian).

11. State archive of the Russia Federation (GARF). F.R. - 1235. Inv. 124. D .75. (In Russian).

12. GARF. F.R. - 1235. Inv. 130. D. 9. (In Russian).

13. State archive of Stavropol territory (GASK). F.R - 299. Inv. 1. D. 784. (In Russian).

14. Ivantsov I.G. Sovetskie formy «maloy avtonomii». Natsional’nye rayony i sel’sovety na Kubani. 1924-1953 gg. (na materialakh Kubani i Severnogo Kavkaza) (The Soviet forms of «low autonomy». National districts and village councils in the Kuban. 1924-1953. (on materials of the Kuban and the North Caucasus). Krasnodar: Al’fa-Print, 2013. 128 p. (In Russian).

15. Maksimov K. N. Kalmyki v sostave donskogo kazachestva (XVII- seredina XX v.) (Kalmyks as part of the Don Cossacks (XVII - mid XX century). Rostov-on-Don: YuNTs RAS publ., 2016. 576 p. (In Russian).

16. Russian state archive of socio-political history (RGASPI). F.R - 65. Inv.1. D. 9. (In Russian).

17. RGASPI. F.R - 65. Inv. 1. D. 148. (In Russian).

18. Kharitonova S.B. Sozdanie special’nogo apparata dlja raboty sredi zhenskogo naselenija v 1920-1930-e gody (regional’nyj opyt) (Creation of a special apparatus for working among the female population in the 1920s-1930s (regional experience) // Vestnik Chuvashskogo universiteta. 2007. No. 3. P. 70 – 79. (In Russian).

19. Center of documentation of modern history of Krasnodar region (TsDNIKK). F. - 493. Inv. 1. D. 21. (In Russian).

20. TsDNIKK. F. - 656. Inv. 1. D. 6. (In Russian).

21. TsDNIKK. F. - 1415. Inv. 1. D. 14. (In Russian).

22. TsDNIKK. F. - 2662. Inv. 1. D. 5. (In Russian).

23. TsDNIKK. F. - 2662. Inv. 1. D. 15. (In Russian).

24. The documentation centre of recent history in Rostov region (TsDNIRO). F. - 7. Inv. 1. D. 165. (In Russian).

25. TsDNIRO). F. - 73. Inv. 1. D. 11. (In Russian).

26. Tsutsiev A. A. Atlas etnopoliticheskoi istorii Kavkaza (1774-2004) (Atlas of the ethnopolitical history of the Caucasus (1774–2004). Moscow: Evropa Publ., 2006. 128 p. (In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Averyanov A.V. SPECIFIC FEATURES OF WORK AMONG THE WOMEN POPULATION IN THE ETHNIC ENVIRONMENT ON THE DON, KUBAN AND STAVROPOL REGION IN 1920–1930s. Humanities and law research. 2021;(2):8-14. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37493/2409-1030.2021.2.1

Views: 274


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2409-1030 (Print)