Smuggling in the criminal legislation of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Armenia: issues of unification
https://doi.org/10.37493/2409-1030.2025.3.17
Abstract
Introduction. Counteraction to customs violations is carried out both at the state and interstate levels. One of these areas is the establishment of criminal liability for smuggling. However, the approach to the definition of smuggling and its signs is ambiguous in different countries, including those that are members of the EAEU, which hinders the fight against customs crime. The existing problem in the form of common customs legislation of the EAEU member states and different approaches to the definition of smuggling, including in Russia and Armenia, requires a solution.
Materials and methods. The research is based on the study, analysis and comparative characterization of the norms of the criminal legislation of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Armenia, which establish criminal liability for smuggling, materials of judicial practice, and the work of specialists devoted to the research topic.
Analysis. In the criminal legislation of Armenia and Russia, approaches to establishing criminal liability for smuggling are periodically changed, both in defining the types of smuggling (including the attitude to economic smuggling) and its signs, which does not contribute to the proper counteraction of the customs offense in question.
Results. The author concludes that despite the existence of common customs legislation the criminal law norms of the two EAEU member states (Russia and Armenia), providing for responsibility for smuggling, have significant differences related to the definition of the contraband item, which requires further measures aimed at their unification.
About the Author
V. V. LavrinovRussian Federation
Vyacheslav V. Lavrinov - Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor
3B, Volokolamsk Str., Rostov-on-Don, 344064; 20 Budennovskiy ave., Rostov-on-Don, 344002
References
1. Bondar EG. The importance of international customs cooperation in ensuring the national and economic security of the Russian Federation. Customs business. 2022;(4):28-32. (In Russ.).
2. Dikanova TA. On the state of crime in the customs sphere and the factors contributing to it. Customs business. 2022;(3):28-31. (In Russ.).
3. Katasonov V. The country was given over to the looting of smugglers. Available from: https://svpressa.ru/economy/article/178374 [Accessed 09 January 2025]. (In Russ.).
4. Lavrinov VV. Criminal liability for customs crimes in the EAEU member states in Features of state regulation of foreign economic activity in modern conditions: proceedings of the IV All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference (Rostov-on-Don, November 16-17, 2017). At 2 p.m. II. Rostov-on-Don: Russian Customs Academy, Rostov branch; 2017. P. 74-83. (In Russ.).
5. Lavrinov VV. Some issues of comparative characteristics of responsibility for customs crimes in the criminal legislation of the Republic of Armenia and the Russian Federation. The Eurasian Law Journal. 2019;12(139):82-84. (In Russ.).
6. Lapshin VF, Kuznetsova NV. On the prospects for the development of criminal legislation in the countries of the Eurasian Economic Union, ensuring the protection of national interests in the field of foreign economic activity. Business security. 2021;(1):21-25. (In Russ.).
7. Nikiforova AA. Responsibility for smuggling and evasion of customs payments: features of delimitation. Customs business. 2022;(4):23-27. (In Russ.).
8. On Amendments to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation: Federal Law No. 420-FZ dated 07.12.2011 in Consultant Plus – Legal Reference System. (In Russ.).
9. On Amendments to Certain Legislative acts of the Russian Federation regarding Countering Illegal Financial transactions: Federal Law No. 134 dated 28. 06.2013 in Consultant Plus – Legal Reference System. (In Russ.).
10. On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation in terms of strengthening measures to counteract the trafficking of counterfeit products and the smuggling of alcoholic beverages and tobacco products": Federal Law No. 530 of December 31, 2014 in Consultant Plus – Legal Reference System. (In Russ.).
11. On Amendments to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation: Federal Law No. 43-FZ dated 11.03.2024 in Consultant Plus – Legal Reference System. (In Russ.).
12. On Amendments to the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated September 13, 2012 No. 923: Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated 31.03.2022 No. 542 Consultant Plus – Legal Reference System. (In Russ.).
13. Podroikina IA, Litvinov DI. Criminal liability for economic types of smuggling in the EAEU Member States. Academic Bulletin of the Rostov Branch of the Russian Customs Academy. 2020;2(39):78-82. (In Russ.).
14. Pulin AO. Criminal law characteristics of art. 226.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The Russian investigator. 2023;(4):39-42. (In Russ.).
15. Ryabko N.V. Some issues of contraband qualification in Features of state regulation of foreign economic activity in modern conditions. Materials of the IV All-Russian scientific and practical conference. Russian Customs Academy, Rostov branch. Rostov-na-Donu; 2017. P. 159-166. (In Russ.).
16. Sarksyan IL. The problem of establishing the legal responsibility of the EAEU Customs Union for smuggling. Customs business. 2021;(4):32-34. (In Russ.).
17. Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia, adopted 05.05.2021. Available from: http://www.parliament.am/law_docs_8/27052021HO199_rus.pdf [Accessed 11 January 2025). (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Lavrinov V.V. Smuggling in the criminal legislation of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Armenia: issues of unification. Humanities and law research. 2025;12(3):489-495. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37493/2409-1030.2025.3.17
























