Preview

Humanities and law research

Advanced search

Party organizations of the RCP(b)–the CPSU(b) of the South-East of Russia in the 1920s: organizational and personnel potential

https://doi.org/10.37493/2409-1030.2024.4.13

Abstract

Introduction. The relevance of the topic under consideration is due to the fact that the experience of training, education, and formation of the personnel potential of the government in the context of the reforms of the 1920s is in demand in modern Russia. It allows, with the reference to historical experience, identifying the main priority areas in the training of managers who are able to work and make decisions in conditions of limited resources. The purpose of the article is to analyze the state of party organizations in the regions of the North Caucasus, which in the 1920s were the only sources of formation of the personnel potential of the Soviet government. The success of the reforms depended on their qualitative composition, namely on the level of literacy and managerial experience.
Materials and Methods. The research is based on the principles of objectivity, determinism, historicism and a systematic approach. Historical-systemic and comparative-historical methods were used.
Analysis. After the victory of the Bolsheviks in the civil war, the highest political leadership of Soviet Russia developed a stable concept of the possibility of building socialism with the active use of militarycommunist methods. Their practical application led to another branch of confrontation in society, which ended with a temporary compromise with the peasantry and the beginning of the implementation of economic and political reforms, which went down in history as a new economic policy, and then socialist modernization. In the course of the reforms initiated, the government of the country and the RCP(b)–VKP(b) faced a serious problem of a shortage of trained managerial personnel for both the economy and the political system. The primary, regional organizations of the RCP(b)–VKP(b) in the field became the main source of personnel replenishment. However, their potential at the regional level was limited, the members of the Communist Party were not always prepared for the professional performance of their duties, which constantly formed a conflict in society.
Results. In the course of the study, the authors came to the conclusion that the personnel policy of the Bolsheviks, based on the principles of one-party rule and the priority of communist representation in all organs and levels of government, hindered the successful implementation of reforms, contributing to the development of corruption, the growth of malfeasance and privileges.

About the Authors

E. V. Tufanov
Stavropol State Agrarian University
Russian Federation

Evgeny V. Tufanov - Dr. Sc. (History), Associate Professor

12, Zootekhnicheskiy Lane, Stavropol, 355035, Russian Federation



Yu. A. Yahutl
Kuban State University
Russian Federation

Yuri A. Yahutl - Dr. Sc. (History), Associate Professor 

149, Stavropolskaya St., Krasnodar, 350040, Russian Federation



References

1. All-Russian Conference of the RCP (Bolsheviks). August 4–7, 1922. Moscow: Moscow Committee of the RCP (b); 1922. 245 p. (In Russ).

2. All-Russian census of members of the RCP in 1922 / Statistical Department of the Central Committee of the RCP (b). Moscow: Publishing departments of the Central Committee of the RCP. Vol. 2; 1923. 71 p. (In Russ).

3. All-Union Population Census of 1926. Vol. V. Moscow: Publishing house of the Central Statistical Office of the USSR Union; 1928. 396 p. (In Russ).

4. State Archives of the Krasnodar Territory. F. R-209. Inv.1. D. 3. (In Russ).

5. Twelfth Congress of the RCP(b). 17 April 25, 1923 Verbatim report. Moscow: Politizdat; 1968. 903 p. (In Russ).

6. Ninth Congress of the RCP (b). March–April 1920 Protocols. Moscow: Party Publishing House; 1934. 612 p. (In Russ).

7. Tenth Congress of the RCP(b). March 1921: Verbatim report. Moscow: Gospolitizdat; 1963. 915 p. (In Russ).

8. History of Kuban XX century: Essays. Ed. VE Shchetneva. Krasnodar: OIPTS Prospects of Education; 1998. 224 p. (In Russ).

9. Kaganovich LM. Memoirs of a worker, communist-Bolshevik, trade union, party and Soviet-state worker. Moscow: Vagrius; 1996. 570 p. (In Russ).

10. The Communist Party of the Soviet Union in resolutions and decisions of congresses, conferences and plenums of the Central Committee (1898–1986). Vol. 3. 1922-1925. 9th ed. Moscow: Politizdat; 1984. 494 p. (In Russ).

11. Regional meeting of communist organizations of the Don and Caucasus (October 27–29, 1920 in Vladikavkaz). Verbatim report. Rostov-on-Don; 1921. 61. p. (In Russ).

12. Lebina NB, Belotskaya O. “One-capping”: A little man in the era of big reforms. Rodina. 2001;(6):62-66. (In Russ).

13. Lenin VI. II All-Russian Congress of Miners January 25 – February 2, 1921. Report on the role and tasks of trade unions at the meeting of the communist faction of the congress on January 23 in Complete Works. Moscow: Politizdat; 1977. Vol. 42. P. 245-261. (In Russ).

14. Lenin VI. The childhood disease of “leftism” in communism in Complete Works. Moscow: Politizdat; 1977. Vol. 41. P. 1-104. (In Russ).

15. Lenin VI. On the conditions for admitting new members to the party in Complete Works. Moscow: Politizdat; 1977. Vol. 45. P. 17-21. (In Russ).

16. Eleventh Congress of the RCP(b). March April 1922: Verbatim report. Moscow: Gospolitizdat; 1961. 873 p. (In Russ).

17. Resolution of the Organizing Bureau of the Central Committee of the RCP (b) “On appointments” dated 12.6.1923. (In Russ).

18. Russian State Archive of Socio-Political History (RSASPH). F. 17. Inv. 34. D. 95. (In Russ).

19. RSASPH. F. 64. Inv. 1. D. 4. (In Russ).

20. RSASPH. F. 17. Inv.84. D. 147. (In Russ).

21. RSASPH. F. 17. Inv. 84. D. 148. (In Russ).

22. Serebryakova TE. Activities of the North Caucasus Regional Committee (1924–1934): thesis. Rostov-on-Don, 1990. 237 p. (In Russ).

23. Tyazhelnikova VS. Composition of party organizations in the late 20s in Questions of the history of the CPSU. 1990;1:75-77. (In Russ).

24. Center for Documentation of the Contemporary History of the Krasnodar Territory (CDNI KK) F. 1. Inv. 1. D. 276 "a". (In Russ).

25. CDNI KK. F. 1. Inv.1. D. 293. (In Russ).

26. CDNI KK. F. 1. Inv. 1. D. 79 "a". (In Russ).

27. CDNI KK. F. 1. Inv. 1. D. 85. (In Russ).

28. CDNI KK. F. 17. Inv. 1. D. 413. (In Russ).

29. CDNI KK. F. 17. Inv. 1. D. 414. (In Russ).

30. CDNI KK. F. 17. Inv. 1. D. 415. (In Russ).

31. CDNI KK. F. 17. Inv. 1. D. 620. (In Russ).

32. CDNI KK. F. 1771. Inv. 1. D. 135. (In Russ).

33. CDNI KK. F. 2817. Inv. 1. D. 1 "a". (In Russ).

34. CDNI KK. F. 2817. Inv. 1. D. 3. (In Russ).

35. CDNI KK. F. 7. Inv. 1. D. 18. (In Russ).

36. CDNI KK. F. 7. Inv. 1. D. 2. (In Russ).

37. CDNI KK. F. 7. Inv. 1. D. 31. (In Russ).

38. CDNI KK. F. 7. Inv. 1. D. 82. (In Russ).

39. CDNI KK. F. 7. Inv. 1. D. 129. (In Russ).

40. CDNI KK. F. 8. Inv. 1. D. 1 "a". (In Russ).

41. CDNI KK. F. 8. Inv. 1. D. 12. (In Russ).

42. CDNI KK. F. 8. Inv. 1. D. 14. (In Russ).

43. CDNI KK. F. 8. Inv. 1. D. 6. (In Russ).

44. Center for Documentation of the Contemporary History of the Rostov Region (CDNI RO). F. 7. Inv. 1. D. 843. (In Russ).

45. CDNI RO. F. 911. Inv. 1. D. 4. (In Russ).

46. CDNI RO. F. 7. Inv. 1. D. 27. (In Russ).


Review

For citations:


Tufanov E.V., Yahutl Yu.A. Party organizations of the RCP(b)–the CPSU(b) of the South-East of Russia in the 1920s: organizational and personnel potential. Humanities and law research. 2024;11(4):715-722. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37493/2409-1030.2024.4.13

Views: 97


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2409-1030 (Print)