Administrative responsibility for offenses in the field of self-regulating organizations of arbitration managers

   Introduction. Administrative responsibility in the field of self-regulating organizations of arbitration managers is a developing sub-institution in the general structure of administrative responsibility, being a relatively new phenomenon associated with the development of self-regulation in this area. It plays an important role in ensuring the rule of law in the activities of these organizations, contributing to the achievement of the goal of preventing the commission of new offenses in the field of insolvency (bankruptcy) and streamlining social ties in the considered segment of the economic field.

   Materials and Methods. The research is based on the application of general scientific methodology (analysis, synthesis, system-structural method, dialectical method) and formal legal method. The use of these methods made it possible to identify the shortcomings of administrative and tort legislation, formulate proposals aimed at improving it. Materials of judicial practice, normative and scientific-theoretical sources were used to conduct the study.

   Analysis. The main areas of analysis are the law enforcement practice of arbitration courts on the issues of reviewing rulings on cases of administrative offenses of self-regulating organizations of arbitration managers related to the terms of performance of their duties and the referral of candidates of arbitration managers to the court.

   Results. The positions of arbitration courts that have developed on the issues of the deadlines for the fulfillment of certain duties by self-regulating organizations of arbitration managers should become a guideline for the law enforcement officer, indicating the correct options for their calculation. The improvement of the pedagogical institute of administrative responsibility of self-regulating organizations of arbitration managers may be associated with the exclusion from the administrative-tort legislation of provisions implying an assessment by officials of executive authorities of the quality of the administration of justice in arbitration cases.

1. Gartina Yu. A. Arbitration manager in the bankruptcy procedure: theoretical and legal problems. Nauka. Obshchestvo. Gosudarstvo = The science. Society. State. 2022; 3 (39): 3-12. (In Russ.).

2. Goleshchikhin V. S. Draft of a new codification of administrative and tort legislation: terminology problems, structuring defects and other shortcomings. Aktual’nye problemy rossiiskogo prava = Actual problems of Russian law. 2023; 2 (147): 34–49. (In Russ.).

3. The Civil Code of the Russian Federation (part one) of November 30, 1994 No. 51-FZ. Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation. 1994. No. 32. Art. 3301. (In Russ.).

4. Institute of insolvency (bankruptcy) in the legal system of Russia and foreign countries: theory and practice of law enforcement / ed. SA Karelin, IV Frolov. M.: Yustitsinform; 2020. 360 p. (In Russ.).

5. The Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses of December 30, 2001 No. 195-FZ. Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation. 2002. No. 1 (Part 1). Art. 1. (In Russ.).

6. Nikitin E. O., Lyutikova E. S. Independence of arbitration managers during insolvency (bankruptcy) procedures. Ekonomicheskoe pravosudie na Dal’nem Vostoke Rossii = Economic justice in the Far East of Russia. 2021; 4 (23): 45–50. (In Russ.).

7. Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the Far Eastern District of March 28, 2022 No. F03-567/2022 in case No. A73-9631/2021. Electronic justice. Available from: https://kad.arbitr.ru/Document/Pdf/a79c71f1-2494-4c8c-bb64-a39deea412d8/541518ad-422e-4773-bad9-c9db00b9b63f/A73-9631-2021_20220328_Postanovlenie_kassacionnoj_instancii.pdf?isAddStamp=True [Accessed 11 March 2022]. (In Russ.).

8. Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the Moscow District of February 7, 2020 No. F05-22131/2019 in case No. A40-12124/2019-33-107. Electronic justice. Available from: https://kad.arbitr.ru/Document/Pdf/cb616195-4eba-4715-9da7-b38ea07af1e4/b2f10639-9ff1-46ff-9c00-9f2dbacb1973/A40-12124-2019_20200207_Reshenija_i_postanovlenija.pdf?isAddStamp=True [Accessed 11 March 2022]. (In Russ.).

9. Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the Central District of February 21, 2023 No. F10-458/2023 in case No. A48-6883/2022. Electronic justice. Available from: https://kad.arbitr.ru/Document/Pdf/8d022ee3-17f1-4141-bb76-7fa9adfd2614/4416e632-92a5-4c2a-a3fc-7b57d871d860/A48-6883-2022_20230221_Postanovlenie_kassacii.pdf?isAddStamp=True [Accessed 11 March 2022]. (In Russ.).

10. Resolution of the Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal dated May 19, 2022 No. 09AP-17226/2022 in case No. A40-291090/2021. Electronic justice. Available from: https://kad.arbitr.ru/Document/Pdf/7f87840e-7ee1-45bb-9b56-b4b7dc3fa413/8f97c030-a2a9-4947-a9ff-77a00b405e06/A40-291090-2021_20220519_Postanovlenie_apelljacionnoj_instancii.pdf?isAddStamp=True [Accessed 11 March 2022]. (In Russ.).

11. The decision of the Arbitration Court of the Kaliningrad Region of June 11, 2021 in case No. A21-10724/2020. Electronic justice. Available from: https://kad.arbitr.ru/Document/Pdf/2fe22fb3-c485-4b9b-a20f-316ee0edc2ac/af75cfcf-0f53-42ae-bfbf-1aa25c78f653/A21-10724-2020_20210611_Reshenija_i_postanovlenija.pdf?isAddStamp=True [Accessed 11 March 2022]. (In Russ.).

12. The decision of the Arbitration Court of the Orel region of October 5, 2022 in case no. A48-6883/2022. Electronic justice. Available from: https://kad.arbitr.ru/Document/Pdf/8d022ee3-17f1-4141-bb76-7fa9adfd2614/2e63da5d-4ef7-4fa0-8482-47bbc404899e/A48-6883-2022_20221005_Reshenija_i_postanovlenija.pdf?isAddStamp=True [Accessed 11 March 2022]. (In Russ.).

13. Rogacheva O. S. Effectiveness of the norms of administrative-tort law. Voronezh: Izdatel’stvo Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta; 2011. 356 p. (In Russ.).

14. Sasykin K. Yu. Problems of interest of arbitration managers in bankruptcy cases. View of the creditor. Aktual’nye problemy gosudarstva i prava = Actual problems of the state and law. 2022;(3): 381-393. (In Russ.).

15. Sokolov A. Yu., Lakaev O. A. A critical look at the draft Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses and the Procedural Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative offenses. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess = Administrative Law and Process. 2020; (8): 44-51. (In Russ.).

16. Tesis D. D. Mechanisms for ensuring the independence of the arbitration manager. Vestnik arbitrazhnoi praktiki = Bulletin of arbitration practice. 2021; (6): 90-96. (In Russ.).

17. Ulezko A. When the arbitration manager is recognized as an interested person: the view of the courts. Yuridicheskaya rabota v kreditnoi organizatsii = Legal work in a credit institution. 2020; 1 (63): 53-57. (In Russ.).

18. Federal Law No. 127-FZ of October 26, 2002 «On insolvency (bankruptcy)». Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation. 2002. No. 43. Art. 4190. (In Russ.).