THE ROMAN-SAMNITE BORDER ALONG THE LIRIS RIVER AS A KEY FACTOR IN THE RELATIONS BETWEEN THE PARTIES IN THE SECOND HALF OF THE IV CENTURY BC
https://doi.org/10.37493/2409-1030.2021.4.2
Abstract
The article examines the problem of the border along the Liris as a factor that determined the confrontational nature of the Roman-Samnite relations. Special studies on this topic are still missing in both domestic and foreign historiography. However, a consistent study of the evolution of Roman-Samnite relations allows us to single out the Liris border as the main factor that determined the nature of the interaction of the parties over the course of 50 years. To confirm this thesis, we trace and analyze the main stages of the diplomatic and military solution of the territorial problem. Delimitation of spheres of influence along the Liris and the conclusion of a defensive alliance under the treaty of 354 Bc laid the foundations for further interaction between the two peoples. At the first stage in 354-343 Bc the Liris was a kind of detente factor in relations between the two sides expanding in the same direction. However, the turning point came in connection with the outbreak of the First Samnite War of 343-341 Bc, begun through the fault of Rome. In the second stage, 341-328 Bc the official nature of the relationship between the parties was determined by the peace treaty of 341 Bc, according to which a legal border was established along the Middle Liris with the concomitant refusal of the Samnites from demarcation along the Lower Liris. Despite the apparent settlement of contradictions, in fact, between the two peoples established a state of mutual mistrust, which every year acquired an increasingly pronounced character. Once again, the Liris Valley was at the center of the confrontation. All this found its expression in the diplomatic struggle of the 330s Bc, which by the beginning of the 320s Bc showed the actual superiority of the forces of Rome due to the stabilization of the militarypolitical situation near its borders, as well as due to the weakening of the Samnites after the war with Alexander of Epirus. The third stage 327-304 Bc marked the final transition of the parties to a military solution to the « Liris problem», the first step towards which, again, was made by Rome. The turning point in hostilities in 313 Bc allowed the Quirites to establish control on both sides of the Lower and Middle Liris, which was then legally enshrined in the peace treaty of 304 Bc. In the future, of course, there were still military clashes between the parties in this region, but after 304 Bc the Liris Valley ceased to play the key role in Roman-Samnite relations. The problem of the border along the Liris was finally solved in favor of Rome.
About the Authors
A. P. BelikovRussian Federation
Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor, Foreign History, Political Science and Foreign Affairs Department, Institute of Humanities
Stavropol
A. I. Cherkasov
Russian Federation
Master of the 1st year of the History course, Institute of Humanities
Stavropol
References
1. Bekker K.F. Drevnyaya istoriya. Polnoe izdanie v odnom tome (Ancient history. complete edition in one volume). M.: Al’faKniga, 2012. 947 p. (In Russian)
2. Vegner V. Rim: Nachalo, rasprostranenie i padenie vsemirnoi imperii rimlyan (Rome: beginning, spread and fall of the world Empire of the Romans). Vol. 1. Mn.: Kharvest, 2002. 656 p. (In Russian)
3. Gertsberg G.F. Istoriya Rima (History of Rome). Kiev; Khar’kov: Izdanie F.A. Iogansona, 1898. 150 p. (In Russian)
4. Gurevich Ya.G. Istoriya Drevnei Gretsii i Rima (The history of Ancient Greece and Rome). SPb.: Tipografiya I. N. Skorokhodova, 1894. 276 p. (In Russian)
5. Egorov A.B. Voiny Rima, ikh prichiny i tseli v rimskoi traditsii (The wars of Rome, their causes and goals in the Roman tradition) // Mnemon. 2012. No. 11. P. 189-208. (In Russian)
6. El’nitskii L.A. Sobytiya 343-340 gg. do n.e. v srednei Italii i narodnoe dvizhenie 342 g. do n.e. v Rime (The events of 343-340 Bc in central Italy and the popular movement of 342 Bc in Rome) // Vestnik drevnei istorii. 1962. No. 2. P. 56-64. (In Russian)
7. Kovalev S.I. Istoriya Rima (History of Rome). SPb.: Poligon, 2002. 864 p. (In Russian)
8. Mashkin N.A. Istoriya Drevnego Rima (The History of Ancient Rome). M.: Vysshaya shkola, 2006. 751 p. (In Russian)
9. Mishulin A.V. Ob»yavlenie voiny i zaklyuchenie mira u drevnikh rimlyan (The declaration of war and the conclusion of peace among the ancient Romans) // Istoricheskii zhurnal. 1944. No. 10-11. P. 100-113. (In Russian)
10. Mommzen T. Istoriya Rima (History of Rome). Vol. 1. Rostov n/D: Feniks, 1997. 640 p. (In Russian)
11. Netushil I.V. Nachalo mirovoi politiki Rimskoi respubliki i konets Latsiya (The beginning of the world politics of the Roman Republic and the end of Latium) // Zhurnal Ministerstva narodnogo prosveshcheniya. 1904. ch. 354. P. 357-390. (In Russian)
12. Nize B. Ocherk rimskoi istorii i istochnikovedeniya (An essay on Roman History and source studies). SPb.: Obshchestvennaya pol’za, 1908. 556 p. (In Russian)
13. Shtoll’ G.V. Istoriya Drevnego Rima v biografiyakh (The history of Ancient Rome in biographies). Smolensk: Rusich, 2003. 576 p. (In Russian)
14. Adcock F.E. The conquest of central Italy // The cambridge Ancient History. Vol. VII. cambridge: University Press, 1928. P. 581-616.
15. Adcock F.E. The Roman Art of War under the Republic. cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1940. 140 p.
16. Allen W.F. A short history of the Roman people. Part 2. Boston: Ginn and company, 1890. 370 p.
17. Arnold T. History of Rome. Vol. 2. 3rd. ed. London: B. Fellowes et al., 1845. 676 p.
18. Boak A.E.R. A history of Rome to 565 AD. N.-Y.: The Macmillan company, 1921. 610 p.
19. cornell T.J. The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000-264 Bc). London; N.-Y.: Routledge, 1995. 507 p.
20. cowan R. Roman conquests: Italy. – Barnsley: Pen and Sword, 2009. 232 p.
21. De Sanctis G. Storia dei Romani. Vol. 2. Torino; Milano; Roma: Fratelli, Bocca, 1907. 575 p.
22. Doberstein W. The Samnite legacy: An examination of the Samnitic influence upon the Roman state: Diss. Lethbridge, 2014. 126 p.
23. Forsythe G. A critical History of Early Rome: From Prehistory to the First Punic War. Berkeley; L.A.; London: University of california Press, 2005. 400 p.
24. Frederiksen M. campania. London: British School at Rome, 1984. 368 p.
25. Giannelli G. Trattato di storia romana. Bologna: Patron, 1976. 523 p.
26. Heurgon J. Rome et la Méditerranée occidentale jusqu’aux guerres puniques. Paris: Presses univ. de France, 1969. 412 p.
27. Histoire romaine. T. 1: Des origines à Auguste / Dir. F. Hinard. Paris: Fayard, 2000. 1075 p.
28. How W.W., Leigh H.D. A History of Rome to the death of caesar. London; N.-Y.; Bombey: Longmans, Green, and co, 1896. 575 p.
29. Hoyer D.c. Samnite Economy and the competitive Environment of Italy in the Fifth to Third centuries bc // Processes of Integration and Identity Formation in the Roman Republic. Leiden: Boston: Brill, 2012. P. 179-196.
30. Humbert M. Municipium et civitas sine suffragio. L’organisation de la conquête jusqu’à la guerre sociale. Rome: École française de Rome Palais Farnèse, 1978. 457 p.
31. Keightley T. The History of Rome. Boston: Billiard, Gray, and company, 1839. 480 p.
32. Klimke c. Der zweite Samniterkrieg. Königshütte: Druck von Franz Ploch, 1882. 18 s.
33. La Regina A. I Sanniti // Italia omnium terrarium parens. Milano: Scheiwiller, 1989. P. 301-432.
34. Liddell H.G. A History of Rome: from the earliest times to the establishment of the Empire. N.-Y.: Harper and brothers, 1887. 768 p.
35. Lomas K. Rome and the Western Greeks 350 Bc – AD 200. London; N.-Y.: Routledge, 2005. 243 p.
36. Lomas K. The Rise of Rome: From the Iron Age to the Punic Wars. cambridge; Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2018. 405 p.
37. Maiuri A. Deductio-deletio. Strategie territoriali di Roma repubblicana: il caso Fregellae // Studi e materiali di storia delle religioni. 2009. № 75/1. P. 89-115.
38. Niebuhr B.G. The History of Rome. Vol. 3 / Tr. by W. Smith, L. Schmitz. London: Taylor and Walton, 1842. 717 p.
39. Oakley S. A commentary on Livy books VII-VIII. Vol. 2. Oxford: clarendon Press, 1998. 880 p.
40. Pirro A. La seconda guerra sannitica. Parte 3. Salerno: Tipografia J. Fratelli, 1898. 168 p.
41. Rawlings L. Army and Battle During the conquest of Italy (350-264 bc) // A companion to the Roman Army. Oxford: Blackwell, 2007. P. 45-62.
42. Salmon E.T. Samnium and the Samnites. cambridge: University Press, 1967. P. 447.
43. Schwarte K.-H. Zum Ausbruch des zweiten Samnitenkrieges (326-304 v. chr.) // Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. 1971. Bd. 20. S. 368-376.
44. Scopacasa R. Ancient Samnium: Settlement, culture, and Identity between History and Archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. 352 p.
45. Scullard H.H. A History of the Roman World: 753-146 Bc. 4th ed. London; N.-Y.: Routledge, 2013. 491 p.
46. Senatore F. Sanniti e Romani tra il Liri e il Melfa // Le epigrafi della Valle di comino: Atti del IV convegno epigrafico cominese (Atina, Palazzo Ducale, 26 maggio 2007). cassino, 2008. P. 161-191.
47. Shuckburgh E.S. A History of Rome to the battle of Actium. N.-Y.: Macmillan and co, 1894. 809 p.
48. Tagliamonte G. I Sanniti: caudini, Irpini, Pentri, carricini, Frentani. Milano: Longanesi and c., 1996. 322 p.
Review
For citations:
Belikov A.P., Cherkasov A.I. THE ROMAN-SAMNITE BORDER ALONG THE LIRIS RIVER AS A KEY FACTOR IN THE RELATIONS BETWEEN THE PARTIES IN THE SECOND HALF OF THE IV CENTURY BC. Humanities and law research. 2021;(4):24-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37493/2409-1030.2021.4.2