THE PROBLEMS OF THE TRAINING SYSTEM OF SCIENTIFIC AND TEACHING STAFF IN POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL

The article considers the main problems of the efficiency of the system of the preparation of scientific and scientific-teaching staff in contemporary conditions of the reformation of system of higher and postgraduate education in the Russian Federation. The integration into the Bologna process has the number of advantages, but became the reason of the series of objective difficulties, unavoidable under the conditions of the projecting of the European approach to higher education system on the existing post-soviet system. One of a such of difficulties is the reconsideration of the approach to the levels of higher and post-graduate education, which has significantly and disputable influenced to the efficiency of the current system of preparation of high-qualified staff. The establishment of the postgraduate school as another stage of higher education and the definition of the getting of a diploma of “researchist. teacher-researchist” as the main purpose of educational process instead the previous main purpose of the preparation and defense of a candidate’s dissertation means the significant change of postgraduate school’s priorities. It seems, that the educational component of this system has the secondary character, by primarily promoting the establishment of a postgraduate student in the role of a researchist, also including the preparation to the teaching process in a university. With that, the preparation of researchist as the high-qualified staff is highly demand not also within the framework of scientific and teaching community, but also in the system of the governing of the field of science and higher education, expert, legislative and other types of activity. And the most markable feature in the labor market is the presence of scientific degree in the relevant field of knowledge, but not the post-graduate school diploma, if the defense did not become the logical finish of study. The indicated problem requires the gradual, multi-stage reformation of the current legislation, which has to be focused to the correct prioritizing in the existing system of preparation of high-qualified staff, their careful selection and further stimulating.

1. The Order of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation dated on 19th November 2013 №1259 edited on 17th August 2020 “Ob utverzhdenii Poryadka organizacii i osushchestvleniya obrazovatelnoj deyatelnosti po obrazovatelnym programmam vysshego obrazovaniya programmam podgotovki nauchno pedagogicheskih kadrov v aspiranture (adyunkture) (On the Establishment of the Order of Organization and Realization of the Educational Activity according to the Educational Programs of Higher Education – Programs of the Preparation of Scientific and Teaching Staff in Post-Graduate School (Post-Graduate School in Military College) (Registered in the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation on 28th January 2014 № 31137 Russian Gazette. Vol. 31. 12th February 2014; Official web-site for legal information. URL: http://www.pravo.gov.ru (Accessed: 15.09.2020). (In Russian).

2. Administrativnoe pravo Rossijskoj Federacii uchebnik dlya bakalavrov pod red. A.Yu. Sokolova (Administrative Law if the Russian Federation: textbook for bachelors) 2-e edition, revised and enlarged. Moscow. Norma, INFRA-M, 2018. 352 p. (In Russian).

3. V.V. Putin: nam nuzhno najti takie resheniya kotorye povysyat prestizh nauchnyj status i dohody prepodavatelej i professorov v regionah obespechat znachitelnyj rost kachestva obrazovaniya i issledovanij v vuzah (V.V. Putin: we have to find such solutions, which will enhance prestige, scientific status and the income of teachers and professors in regions, and will provide the significant growth of the quality of education and research in universities) // Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya. Vol. 3. 2020. P. 2-10. (In Russian).

4. Gvildis T.Yu., Okereshko A.V. Refleksivnaya model stimulirovaniya aspirantov k informalnomu obrazovaniyu (The Reflexive Model of the Stimulating of Post-Graduate Students to Informal Education) // Pedagogika Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Vol. 1. 2020. P. 89–98.

5. Lucenko S.I. Obshchestvennyj zapros na reformirovanie sistemy aspirantury v Rossijskoj Federacii (The Social Request to the Reformation of the System of Post-Graduate School in the Russian Federation) // Obshchestvo i ehkonomika. Vol. 6. 2020. P. 73–84.

6. Plugar D.M., Vasileva A.V. Aktualnye voprosy podgotovki nauchno pedagogicheskih kadrov dlya organov i organizacij prokuratury Rossijskoj Federacii (Actual Issues of the Preparation of Scientific and Teaching Staff for the Bodies and Organizations of Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation) // Voprosy rossijskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava. 2020. Vol. 1-1. P. 379–387.

7. Terentev E.A., Rybakov N.V. Bednyj B.I. Zachem segodnya idut v aspiranturu. Tipologizaciya motivov rossijskih aspirantov (Why People Goes to the Post-Graduate School Today. The Typology of the Motives of Russian Post-Graduate Students) // Voprosy obrazovaniya. 2020. Vol. 1. P. 40–69.

8. Todosijchuk A.V. O sovershenstvovanii sistemy podgotovki i attestacii nauchnyh kadrov (On the Improvement of the System of Preparation and Attestation of Scientific Staff) Ekonomist. 2019. Vol. 4. P. 57–67.