EVENT AND COMPOSITION OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE OFFENSE: DIFFERENCE OF DEFINITIONS ON THE EXAMPLE OF LIABILITY FOR VIOLATIONS WHEN CHOOSING A PROCUREMENT METHOD
https://doi.org/10.37493/2409-1030.2021.3.12
Abstract
The purpose of the work is to formulate a difference
in the legal consequences of termination of proceedings
in the case of an administrative offense on the grounds
of «absence of an event of an offense» and «absence of
an offense». The objectives of the study are to analyze the similarities and differences of these definitions on the example of responsibility for violations of the legislation on the contract system when choosing a procurement method and to justify the importance of their correct application in the administrative process. The paper applies general scientific methods of research comparison and analysis and the method of expert assessments. The author uses examples of administrative and judicial practice to consider law enforcement practice for assessingthe presence or absence of an event and composition of an administrative offense in specific cases. For the first time in the conditions of adoption of the optimization package of changes to the contract system in the field of procurement, the issue of liability for violations when choosing a method for determining the supplier (executor, contractor) is considered. The relevance of the work lies in the fact that the procurement legislation regularly changes, mainly in the direction of liberalization, and the norms of the Code of Administrative Offenses with «tough» sanctions are stable, in connection with which there is a need to analyze practice and develop recommendations to prevent possible errors. At the same time, it is necessary to take into account the inconsistency of law enforcement practice on this topic. The work can be useful to officials of state and municipal customers, an employee of control bodies, students of law schools, as well as anyone interested in the administrative process.
Digitalization of procurement poses new requirements for determining the areas of responsibility of officials for various procurement procedures within the contract system. Recommendations are given on the prevention of violations for which administrative responsibility can be applied, including through the development of local legal acts, as well as officials brought to administrative responsibility for violations when choosing a method of procurement of goods, works, services for state and municipal needs on ways and methods of legal protection. The Reference Legal System ConsultantPlus is used in the work
About the Author
G. DobretsovRussian Federation
Dobretsov Grigori – Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor at the Department of Administrative Law, Senior Researcher of SRC-1
Moscow
References
1. Baryshev S.A. Problemy sistematizatsii sostavov administrativnykh pravonarushenii v sfere kontraktnoi sistemy (Problems of systematization of compositions of administrative offenses in the sphere of the contract system) // Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo filiala «Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta pra-vosudiya». 2015. Vol. 11. P. 54-57. (In Russian).
2. Kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 № 195-FZ (Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses) // SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. Zakonodatel’stvo. VersiyaProf. (In Russian).
3. Obzor praktiki primeneniya antimonopol’nogo zakonodatel’stva kollegial’nymi organami FAS Rossii (za period s 1 iyulya 2018 goda po 1 iyulya 2019 goda) (Review of the practice of application of antimonopoly legislation by collegial bodies of the FAS of Russia (for the period from July 1, 2018 to July 1, 2019) Utverzhdeno protokolom Prezidiuma FAS Rossii. P. 7 URL: https://fas.gov.ru. (Accessed: 21.09.2021). (In Russian).
4. Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 02.03.2021 No. 309-ES21-215 po delu N A60-59271/2019 (Determination of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation) // SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. Zakonodatel’stvo. VersiyaProf. (In Russian).
5. Pis’mo FAS Rossii ot 14.11.2019 No. IA/100041/19 «O poryadke primeneniya punktov 4, 5 chasti 1 stat’i 93 Federal’nogo zakona ot 05.04.2013 № 44-FZ «O kontraktnoi sisteme v sfere zakupok tovarov, rabot, uslug dlya obespecheniya gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal’nykh nuzhd» (Letter about the FAS of Russia of 14.11.2019 N IA / 100041/19 «On the pro-cedure for applying paragraphs 4, 5 of part 1 of Article 93 of the Federal Law of 05.04.2013 No. 44-FZ) / SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. Zakonodatel’stvo. VersiyaProf. (In Russian).
6. Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Volgo-Vyatskogo okruga ot 27.05.2021 po delu No. A31-12102/2020 (Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the Volga-Vyatka District) // SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. Zakonodatel’stvo. VersiyaProf. (In Russian).
7. Postanovlenie Devyatogo kassatsionnogo suda obshchei yurisdiktsii ot 21.01.2020 N 16-178/2020 (Resolution of the Ninth Court of Cassation of General Jurisdiction) // SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. Zakonodatel’stvo. VersiyaProf. (In Russian).
8. Postanovlenie Devyatogo kassatsionnogo suda obshchei yurisdiktsii ot 17.04.2020 No. 16-1054/2020 (Resolution of the Ninth Court of Cassation of General Jurisdiction of 17.04.2020 No. 16-1054/2020) // SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. Zakonodatel’stvo. VersiyaProf. (In Russian).
9. Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 13.04. 2021 No. 13-P (Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 13.04. 2021 No 13-P) // SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. Zakonodatel’stvo. VersiyaProf. (In Russian).
10. Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo suda RF ot 15.06.2021 No. 28-P (Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 15.06.2021 No 28-P) // SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. Zakonodatel’stvo. VersiyaProf. (In Russian).
11. Postanovlenie Saratovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 15.11. 2019 No. 29-85/2019 (Resolution of the Saratov Regional Court of 15.11. 2019 No 29-85/2019) // SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. Zakonodatel’stvo. VersiyaProf. (In Russian).
12. Postanovlenie Sed’mogo kassatsionnogo suda obshchei yurisdiktsii ot 24.06.2021 No. 16-2173/2021 (Resolution of the Seventh Court of Cassation of General Jurisdiction of 24.06.2021 No. 16-2173/2021) // SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. Zakonodatel’stvo. VersiyaProf. (In Russian).
13. Postanovlenie UFAS po g. Moskve ot 16.02.2016 g. No. 4-7.30-116/77-16 (Resolution of UFAS in Moscow of 16.02.2016 N 4-7.30-116/77-16) // SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. Zakonodatel’stvo. VersiyaProf. (In Russian).
14. Postanovlenie UFAS po g. Moskve ot 09.06.2016 No. 4-7.29-603/77-16 (Resolution of UFAS in Moscow from 09.06.2016 No 4-7.29-603/77-16) // SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. Zakonodatel’stvo. VersiyaProf. (In Russian).
15. Postanovlenie UFAS po Lipetskoi oblasti ot 13.02.2018 No. 41-T-18 (Resolution of the FEDERALAS in the Lipetsk region of 13.02.2018 No 41-T-18) // SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. Zakonodatel’stvo. VersiyaProf. (In Russian).
16. Postanovlenie UFAS po Murmanskoi oblasti ot 01.09.2015 No. 06-04/15-100 (Resolution of UFAS in the Murmansk region of 01.09.2015 No 06-04/15-100) // SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. Zakonodatel’stvo. VersiyaProf. (In Russian).
17. Postanovlenie UFAS po Murmanskoi oblasti ot 22.10.2020 po delu № 051/04/7.29-288/2020 (Resolution of the FEDERALAS in the Murmansk region of 22.10.2020 in case No. 051/04/7.29-288/2020) // SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. Zakonodatel’stvo. VersiyaProf. (In Russian).
18. Postanovlenie UFAS po Orenburgskoi oblasti ot 31.08.2015 goda No. 08-13-117/2015 (Resolution of the Federal Antimonopoly Service in the Orenburg region of 31.08.2015 No 08-13-117/2015) // SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. Zakonodatel’stvo. VersiyaProf. (In Russian).
19. Postanovlenie UFAS po Respublike Altai ot 27.05.2021 po delu No. 004/04/7.29-153/2021 (Resolution of the Federal Antimonopoly Service for the Altai Republic of 27.05.2021 in case No. 004/04/7.29-153/2021) // SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. Zakonodatel’stvo. VersiyaProf. (In Russian).
20. Postanovlenie UFAS po Tverskoi oblasti ot 11.05. 2018 No. 05-5/1-24-2018 (Resolution of the FEDERALAS in the Tver region of 11.05. 2018 No 05-5/1-24-2018) // SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. Zakonodatel’stvo. VersiyaProf. (In Russian).
21. Postanovlenie FAS Rossii ot 28.02.2018 g. No. VP-92/17/AK042-18 (Resolution of the FAS of Russia of 28.02.2018 No VP-92/17/AK042-18) // SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. Zakonodatel’stvo. VersiyaProf. (In Russian).
22. Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Respubliki Khakasiya ot 27.02.19 g. po delu No. A74-18804/2018 (Decision of the Arbitration Court of the Republic of Khakassia of 27.02.19 in case No. A74-18804/2018) // SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. Zakonodatel’stvo. VersiyaProf. (In Russian).
23. Reshenie Verkhovnogo suda Respubliki Adygeya ot 28.02.2018 po delu No. 7-52/2018god (Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Adygea of 28.02.2018 in case No. 7-52/2018god) // SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. Zakonodatel’stvo. VersiyaProf. (In Russian).
24. Reshenie Krasnodarskii kraevogo suda ot 23.01.2020. po delu N 12-180/20 (Decision of the Krasnodar Regional Court of 23.01.2020. in case N 12-180/20) // SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. Zakonodatel’stvo. VersiyaProf. (In Russian).
25. Reshenie Magadanskogo oblastnogo suda ot 22.05.2020 No. 12-6/2020 Delo N 7-18/2020 (Decision of the Magadan Regional Court of 22.05.2020 No. 12-6/2020 Case N 7-18/2020) // SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. Zakonodatel’stvo. VersiyaProf. (In Russian).
26. Rukavishnikov S.M. Ob ustanovlenii formy viny po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh, podvedomstvennym antimonopol’nomu organu (On the establishment of the form of guilt in cases of administrative offenses, subordinate to the antimonopoly authority) //Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi yuridicheskoi akademii. 2019. No. 3 (128). P. 121-126. (In Russian).
27. Tikhomirova L.A. Nyuansy zakonodatel’stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. Podgotovlen dlya sistemy «Konsul’tantPlyus» // SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. Zakonodatel’stvo. VersiyaProf. (In Russian).
28. Federal’nyi zakon RF ot 05.04.2013 No. 44-FZ «O kontraktnoi sisteme v sfere zakupok tovarov, rabot, uslug dlya obespecheniya gosudarstven-nykh i munitsipal’nykh nuzhd» (Tikhomirova L.A. Nuances of legislation on administrative offenses. Prepared for the system «ConsultantPlus») // SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. Zakonodatel’stvo. VersiyaProf. (In Russian).
29. Reshenie Chelyabinskogo oblastnogo suda ot 28.02.2019 po delu No. 7-280/2019 (Decision of the Chelyabinsk Regional Court of 28.02.2019 in case N 7-280/2019) // SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. Zakonodatel’stvo. VersiyaProf. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Dobretsov G. EVENT AND COMPOSITION OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE OFFENSE: DIFFERENCE OF DEFINITIONS ON THE EXAMPLE OF LIABILITY FOR VIOLATIONS WHEN CHOOSING A PROCUREMENT METHOD. Humanities and law research. 2021;(3):86-95. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37493/2409-1030.2021.3.12