THE BRITISH FACTOR IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL MOVEMENT OF ARMENIANS OF WESTERN ARMENIA IN THE LAST THIRD OF THE XIXTH CENTURY IN THE ASSESSMENT OF COLONEL D.V. PUTYATA
https://doi.org/10.37493/2409-1030.2021.3.6
Abstract
D.V. Putyata is known in Russia as a major orientalist, diplomat, traveler and military officer, his studies of China became famous in our country and abroad at the beginning of the XXth century. However, D.V. Putyata left interesting notes about his stay in Western Armenia in the summer of 1895. Unfortunately, that work of the author is practically unknown in modern historiography, which explains the relevance of this article. D.V. Putyata, as one of the problems that had a significant impact on the position of the Armenian population in Western Armenia, as well as the Ottoman Empire, in general, highlights the active intervention of Great Britain in solution of the Armenian question. This problem caused active discussions among representatives of the ruling elite of Russia at the turn of the XIXth and XXth centuries, in Soviet and modern historiography. Therefore, paying attention to the work of D.V. Putyata, on the one hand, will make it possible to analyze one of the channels of information flow in St. Petersburg about the situation in Western Armenia, on the basis of which Russian establishment formed the country policy on the Armenian issue, and, on the other hand, get an appealing factual material. It should be noted that D.V. Putyata’s views on the position of affairs in Western Armenia are not indisputable and they are not always coincident with the positions of modern studies. But, it does not implore the value of this work for orientalists. In the conclusion of the article, it is emphasized that D.V. Putyata, while recognizing the objective reasons for the uprising of the Armenian population in 1894-1896, at the same time the article focuses on the activities of British diplomats, the press and politicians oriented to developing the national identity of Armenians and their national liberation movement in Western Armenia. D.V. Putyata did not approve such actions of Great Britain, believing that it seeks to strengthen its own positions in the Middle East by hiding behind concern for the oppressed Christian people by hiding behind concern for the oppressed Christian people. The author has a fellow feeling for supporters of moderate reforms based on a compromise with the Porte, they were constantly discredited by British newspapers and diplomats.
About the Author
I. KryuchkovRussian Federation
Kryuchkov Igor – Doctor of History, Professor, Head of Chair of Foreign History, Political Science and International Relations
Stavropol
References
1. Andreev A. I. Rossiiskie ekspeditsii v Tsentral’noi Azii (1870-1920-e gody): nauchnye i voenno-politicheskie aspekty (Russian expeditions in Central Asia (1870s - 1920s): scientific and military-political aspects) // Obshchestvo. Kommunikatsiya. Obrazovanie. 2012. No. 4. P. 103–109. (In Russian).
2. Arutyunyan G.M. Politika Anglii v armyanskom voprose v 90-kh godakh XIX veka i pozitsiya velikikh derzhav: (problematika, istochnikovedcheskii i istoriograficheskii. obzor) (The policy of England on the Armenian issue in the 90s of the XIX century and the position of the great powers: (problems, source study and historiographic review) // Vestnik Erevanskogo universiteta. Obshchestvennye nauki. 1988. No. 2. P. 26–36. (In Russian).
3. Berlinskii traktat 1/13 iyulya 1878 g. (Treaty of Berlin 1/13 July 1878) // Sbornik dogovorov Rossii s drugimi gosudarstvami 1856–1917 gg. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury, 1952. P. 181–206. (In Russian).
4. Kapangar A. Ekonomicheskie perspektivy Vostochnoi Anatolii (Economic Prospects for Eastern Anatolia). Tiflis: Tipografiya «Epokha», 1913. 54 p. (In Russian).
5. Kirkarasyan A. D. Velikobritaniya i armyanskii vopros. (90-e gg. XIX v.) (Great Britain and the Armenian question. (90s of the XIX century). Erevan: AIASTAN, 1990. 240 p. (In Russian).
6. Lamzdorf V. N. Dnevnik 1894–1896 gg. (Diary 1894–1896). Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1991. 456 p. (In Russian).
7. Sbornik geograficheskikh, topograficheskikh i statisticheskikh materialov po Azii. Issue. LXVI. Zapiski o Maloi Azii. Polkovnika General’nogo shtaba polkovnik Putyata (Collection of geographical, topographic and statistical materials on Asia. Issue LXVI. Notes on Asia Minor. Colonel of the General Staff Colonel Putyata). St. Petersburg: Voennaya tipografiya, 1896. 154 p. (In Russian).
8. Pavlov D. B. D. V. Putyata i ego voenno-instruktorskii proekt v Koree i Kitae (D.V. Putyata and his military instructor project in Korea and China) // Trudy Instituta rossiiskoi istorii RAN. 2019. No.15. P. 120–154. (In Russian).
9. Plekhanov A. E. Anglo-russkaya politika v otnoshenii Afganistana v kontse XIX – nachale XX vv. (English-Russian policy in Afghanistan in the late 19th – early 20th centuries) // Vestnik Ryazanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. S. A. Esenina. 2021. No. 2. P. 56–64. (In Russian).
10. Putyata D. V. Avstro-Vengriya. Kratkii voenno-geograficheskii obzor Galitsiiskoi oblasti. Po novoi programme 1907 g. (Austria-Hungary. Brief military-geographical overview of the Galician region. According to the new program of 1907). Odessa: Tipografiya Shtaba Odesskogo voennogo okruga, 1909. 24 p. (In Russian).
11. Putyata D. V. Kitai: ocherki geografii, ekonomicheskogo sostoyaniya, administrativnogo i voennogo ustroistva Seredinnoi Imperii i voennogo znacheniya pogranichnoi s Rossiei polosy (China: geography essays, economy, administrative and military structure of the Middle Empire and the military significance of the border strip with Russia). St. Petersburg: Voennaya tipografiya, 1895. 265 p. (In Russian).
12. Brent J. Travels Amongst the Armenian // The Contemporary Review. 1896. Vol. 70. P. 695–709.
Review
For citations:
Kryuchkov I. THE BRITISH FACTOR IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL MOVEMENT OF ARMENIANS OF WESTERN ARMENIA IN THE LAST THIRD OF THE XIXTH CENTURY IN THE ASSESSMENT OF COLONEL D.V. PUTYATA. Humanities and law research. 2021;(3):48-54. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37493/2409-1030.2021.3.6