“Prometheism” and the ideas of independence of the Caucasus in the foreign policy plans of Poland in the 1920-1930s
https://doi.org/10.37493/2409-1030.2025.4.3
Abstract
Introduction. The issue of international relations between Poland and Russia remains an important field of research not only for political scientists but also for historians. The politics of memory is becoming an important component of the public political strategy for interpreting and consolidating historical discourse in the public consciousness, which helps regulate the functioning of collective memory. Commemorative practices are particularly in demand during periods of change for society, primarily during the formation or restoration of statehood, when the search for conceptual principles of a national idea is underway. In this regard, it is interesting to consider the idea of Prometheism as a special component of the foreign policy concept of Poland (the Second Polish Republic) in relation to the USSR.
Materials and methods. The study is based on the analysis of diplomatic correspondence, Polish intelligence reports, and reports of Prometheus organizations, documents based on the diachronic method, taking into account the historical context.
Analysis showed that the Caucasian Prometheus vector of the policy of Poland was directly dependent on its foreign policy objectives and the current political situation, which was determined by its interactions with Germany and the USSR.
Results. The Caucasus did not play a decisive role in Polish policy in the 1920s and 1930s, but was viewed as a significant area capable of undermining the USSR domestic political stability through the destabilization of its national outskirts. It was seen as a desired outcome of the activities of émigré circles from Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, and the North Caucasus who shared the Promethean idea. The formation of the Confederation of the Caucasus under Polish auspices failed in the 20th century, but the efforts of Poland to integrate the states of the South Caucasus into the orbit of EU policy can be considered as a follow-up.
About the Authors
L. N. VelichkoРоссия
Lyudmila N. Velichko, Cand. Sc. (History), Associate Professor
1 Pushkin St., Stavropol, 355017
G. N. Rykun
Россия
Galina N. Rykun, Dr. Sc. (History), Professor
46, 40th Anniversary of October Ave., Pyatigorsk, 357500
References
1. Adamchevskij P. Russia and the Caucasus in the political world. Vestnik Rossijskoj Akademii nauk. 2018; 88.9:826-834. URL: https://ras.jes.su/rasherald/s207987840000931-3-1 (accessed: 20.10.2025) (In Russ.)
2. Bovdunov AL. The Eastern Vector of Russia's Foreign Policy: Geopolitical Tradition and Modernity. Rossija v XXI v. 2012;2:54-69. (In Russ.)
3. Bylinin VK, Zdanovich AA, Korotaev VI. Organization "Prometheus " I" prometheyskoe " dvizhenie in Plana pol'skoj razvedki after the Rossii – USSR collapse In: Proceedings of the Society for the Study of the History of the Russian Special Services. Vol. 3. Moscow: Kuchkovo pole, 2007. 439 p. URL: https://history.wikireading.ru/hD79LNu3Zv (accessed: 20.10.2025) (In Russ.)
4. Zejnalova S. Formation of ethnic communities of West Slavic peoples in the Caucasus (19th - early 20th centuries). Kavkaz&globalizacija 2011;5;3-4:106-119. (In Russ.)
5. Ishakov S. Promethean Problems at the Beginning of World War II: The View of German Diplomat F. von Papen URL: https://nowy-prometeusz.pl/category/rus/ (accessed: 26.10.2025) (In Russ.)
6. The Caucasian Confederation in official declarations, secret correspondence and secret documents of the Prometheus movement: collection of documents / G.G. Mamulia. Moscow: Social'no-politicheskaja MYSL, 2012. 240 p. (In Russ.)
7. Kurganskij AA. Prometheism in Russia's Foreign Policy during the Interwar period In: Science Days – 2018. Collection of articles: scientific electronic edition. Kaliningrad: BaltFU, 2018. p. 35-42 (In Russ.)
8. Malyshev DV. Intermarium as a virtual project in the early 2020s: key realities. Postsovetskie issledovanija. 2024;4(7):370375. (In Russ.)
9. Oficerov-Bel'skij D. Poland's Eastern Policy: Conceptual Framework and Practical Aspects. Rossija i novye gosudarstva Evrazii. 2023;IV (LXI):51- 61. (In Russ.)
10. Rashh M. Poland's Eastern Policy: Conceptual Framework and Practical Aspects. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija. 2017;4:363-378. (In Russ.)
11. Simonova TM. "Prometheism" in Polish Foreign Policy, 1919–1924. Novaja i Novejshaja istorija. 2002;4:47 – 63. (In Russ.)
12. Shustrov MA. The origins of Poland's modern Eastern policy. Istorija i sovremennoe mirovozzrenie. 2021;3;4:49-57. (In Russ.)
13. Bartoszewicz H., Misja Romana Knolla w Ankarze 1924–1925 In: Studia z Dziejów Rosji i Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej. 2001. Vol. 36 URL: http://rcin.org.pl/dlibra/docmetadata?id=44262&from=publication (accessed: 21.10.2025).
14. II Rzeczpospolita wobec ruchu prometejskiego/ [red. nauk., wstęp, wybór i oprac. Paweł Libera]. Warszawa: Centr. archiwum wojskowe im. mjr. Bolesława Waligóry, 2013. 575 s.
15. Landmann T Ruch prometejski jako defensywny element polityki bezpieczeństwa II RP w latach 1926–1932. Wschodnioznawstwo. 2020;14:297-322.
16. Libera Р. Polish authorities and the attempt to create the Caucasian Confederation (1917–1940) In. Studia z Dziejów Rosji i Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej [online]. 19 sierpień 2018. Vol. 52. No 3. p. 231–252.URL.: https://apcz.umk.pl/SDR/article/view/SDR.2017.EN3.11 (accessed: 22.10.2025)
17. Łysek W. Schyłek prometeizmu (1935–1940) In Studia nad Totalitaryzmami i Wiekiem XX. 21 wrzesień 2025. Vol. 4. S. 12–33 (PL), 308.
18. Mądzik М. Próby nawiązania stosunków politycznych między Polską a Gruzją w latach 1918 – 1921 URL.: https://gfsis.org.ge/files/library/pdf/Geo-3288.pdf (accessed:19.10.2025).
Review
For citations:
Velichko L.N., Rykun G.N. “Prometheism” and the ideas of independence of the Caucasus in the foreign policy plans of Poland in the 1920-1930s. Humanities and law research. 2025;12(4):592–598. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37493/2409-1030.2025.4.3
JATS XML
























