Preview

Humanities and law research

Advanced search

THE INSTITUTE OF REFERENDUM IN THE CONTEXT OF MEMBERSHIP IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

https://doi.org/10.37494/2409-1030-2019-4-168-174

Abstract

The article discusses the main issues of holding referen-dums in particular European Union member-states in relation to issues related to the functioning and development of the EU. The author gives a description of the current importance of the institute of the referendum in connection with ongoing processes of regional integration and the participation of states in them on the basis of delegation of sovereign powers. Membership in the European Union, as an international organization sui generis, provides for the states' transfer of part of their key sovereign powers to EU institutions and bodies. This institution is inextricably connected with the concept of «sovereignty», namely with the concept of «pop-ular sovereignty)), which implies the participation of citizens in the execution of functions of the state, including with regard to participation in interstate entities. An expression of this, among other things, is the institution of a referendum. Many member-states of the European Union use referenda to resolve issues related to European regional integration processes. The author of the paper identiies three catego- ries of referenda related to EU membership. Firstly, these are referenda regarding accession to the European Union. The second category includes referenda regarding the approval of international treaties of the Union, which amend the EU constituent treaties. The third category includes referenda on secession from the European Union. Exit referenda held in the UK in 1975 and 2016 fall into this category. If a negative result was obtained at the irst, the second referendum became the reason for initiating the process of Great Britain's exit from the European Union - Brexit. In general, referenda as a priority form of direct democracy continue their genesis at a qualitatively new level: the circle of countries practicing referenda is expanding with the goal of making socially significant decisions; the range of issues submitted to a popular vote is increasing, and the referenda held in individual states are acquiring not only national but also international signiicance, which is conirmed by the practice of the European Union.

About the Author

D. Galushko
Voronezh State University
Russian Federation


References

1. Авакьян С. А. Конституционное право России: в 2 т. Т.1. М.: Норма: ИНФРА-М, 2011. 864 с.

2. Воронков Л. С. О многообразии интеграционных процессов в Европе // Вестник МГИМО Университета. 2013. №4 (31). С. 98-105.

3. Галушко Д. В. Правовые и институционные основы взаимодействия Ирландии и Европейского союза: монография. Воронеж: Издательско-полиграфический центр ВГУ, 2008. 187 с.

4. Галушко Д. В. О суверенитете государства в международном праве // Вестник Воронежского государственного университета. Серия: Право. 2013. №1 (14). С. 366-374.

5. Галушко Д. В. Международно-правовые проблемы правосубъектности государств (на примере Ирландии): монография. М.: Юрлитинформ, 2017. 224 с.

6. Галушко Д. В. Взаимодействие права Европейского союза с правом государств-членов и третьих стран: монография. Воронеж: Издательский дом ВГУ, 2018. 186 с.

7. Зверева Т. В. О референдумах в Европейском союзе // Вестник Дипломатической академии МИД России. Россия и мир. 2016. №4 (10). С. 45-57.

8. Кембаев Ж. М. Региональная интеграция в Евразии: основные признаки, проблемы и перспективы // Российский юридический журнал. 2016. №1. С. 32-45.

9. Кембаев Ж. М. Сравнительно-правовой анализ Комиссий Евразийского и Европейского Союзов // Современное право. 2012. №12. С.129-132.

10. Марченко М. Н. Государственный суверенитет: проблемы определения понятия и содержания // Правоведение. 2003. №1. С. 186-197.

11. Машкова Е. В. Особенности формирования и новые тенденции развития межрегиональной зоны свободной торговли, созданной Европейской ассоциацией свободной торговли // Пробелы в российском законодательстве. 2016. №8. С. 389-395.

12. Act concerning the conditions of accession and the adjustments to the treaties (1972) // Official Journal. 27.03.1972. L.73.

13. Bjorklund T. Old and New Patterns: The «No» Majority in the 1972 and 1994 EC/EU Referendums in Norway // Acta Sociologica. 1997. No.40. P.143-159.

14. Buchan D. Outsiders on the Inside: Swiss and Norwegian Lessons for the UK. London: Centre for European Reform, 2012. URL: http://www.cer.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/ attachments/pdf/2012/buchan_swiss_norway_11oct12-6427.pdf (Accessed: 01.07.2019).

15. Butcher P., Stratulat C. The European Citizens' Consultations: Evaluation report. European Policy Centre. URL: http:// www.epc.eu/pub_details.php?cat_id=1&pub_id=8839&year=2018 (Accessed: 01.07.2019).

16. Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union OJ C 202, 7.6.2016, p. 13-388 (EN). URL: https://eur-lex. europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12016M/TXT (Accessed: 01.07.2019).

17. Draft Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, as agreed at negotiators' level on 14 November 2018. URL: https:// ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/draft_withdrawal_agreement_0.pdf (Accessed: 01.07.2019).

18. Fossum J.E. Norway's European conundrum // ARENA Working Papers. 2009. No. 4. URL: https://www.sv.uio.no/ arena/english/research/publications/arena-working-papers/2001-2010/2009/WP04_09.pdf (Accessed: 01.07.2019).

19. Hathaway O. A. International Delegation and State Sovereignty. URL: http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent. cgi?article=1455&context=lcp (Accessed: 01.07.2019).

20. Miller V. The Treaty of Lisbon after the Second Irish Referendum. URL: https://www.voltairenet.org/IMG/pdf/Treaty_of_ Lisbon_after_the_Second_Irish_Referendum.pdf (Accessed: 01.07.2019).

21. Prime Minister's letter to Donald Tusk triggering Article 50. URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/prime-ministers-letter-to-donald-tusk-triggering-article-50 (Accessed: 01.07.2019).

22. Setala M., Schiller T. Referendums and representative democracy: Responsiveness, accountability and deliberation. New York: Routledge, 2009.

23. Sovereignty in Transition / Ed. Walker N. Portland: Hart Publishing, 2003.

24. The Constitution of the Republic of Estonia. URL: https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/530102013003/consolide (Дата обращения: 01.07.2019).

25. The Constitution of Ireland. URL: http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/cons/en (Accessed: 01.07.2019).

26. The United Kingdom's exit from and new partnership with the European Union // UK Government. London, 2017. URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-united-kingdoms-exit-from-and-new-partnership-with-the-european-union-white-paper (Accessed: 01.07.2019).

27. Treaty between the Member States of the European Communities and the Kingdom of Denmark, Ireland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland concerning the accession of the Kingdom of Denmark, Ireland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to the European Economic Community and the European Atomic Energy Community (1972) // Official Journal. 27.03.1972. P. 73.

28. Treaty concerning the accession of Norway, Austria, Finland and Sweden to the European Union // Oficial Journal. 29.08.1994. P. 241.


Review

For citations:


Galushko D. THE INSTITUTE OF REFERENDUM IN THE CONTEXT OF MEMBERSHIP IN THE EUROPEAN UNION. Humanities and law research. 2019;(4):168-174. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37494/2409-1030-2019-4-168-174

Views: 137


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2409-1030 (Print)