Preview

Humanities and law research

Advanced search

The essence of electoral struggle in the Scottish counties during the elections to the house of commons of the United Kingdom (1707–1832)

https://doi.org/10.37493/2409-1030.2022.2.10

Abstract

In this article the researcher examines the essence of the struggle to be elected to the UK Parliament in Scottish counties in the context of rules, processes comprising the electorial system being completely discredited. Traditionally, researchers (R. M. Sunter, J. Ferguson, A. Murdoch, W. Ferguson) concentrated their attention on the dominant role of patronage and personal relations on the outcome of elections in Scottish counties. Historians also agree that land qualification was the reason of the small number of voters and that the possibility of formal land cessions for life led to fictitious voters. However, researchers do not pay enough attention to the scale that land distribution influenced electoral struggle in different regions.

The research is based on the source «View of the political state of Scotland in the last century: a confidential report on the political opinions, family connections, or personal circumstances of the 2662 county voters in 1788». The aforementioned work contains information on all the voters and on the electoral situation in each of the counties. Based on this source the researchers determine the extent to which land distributions influenced the election process in Scottish counties. The authors come to the conclusion that the size and the number of estates created the framework of the system existing in the counties and thus largely determined the outcome of the elections. The analysis of the source reveals that depending on the land distributions counties could have completely different situations. For example, in one county personal relations between local political actors could have major influence on the outcome of the elections if several voters had more or less equal land ownership (including the possible fictitious votes), and no influence in another if the said county was controlled by a single landholder.

About the Author

M. A. Mukhin
Southern Federal University
Russian Federation

Mukhin Maksim А. – Postgraduate student, Department of World History and International Relations, Institute of History and International Relations

105/42, st. B. Sadovaya, 344006, Rostov-on-Don



References

1. Maksimenko M.A. Podgotovka zakona o predstavitelstve shotlandskogo naroda v 20-30-h godah XIX veka i ego vlijanie na formirovanie politicheskih potrebnostej srednego klassa (Preparation of the law on the representation of the Scottish people in the 20–30 years of the 19th century and its influence on the formation of the political needs of the middle class) // Izvestija vuzov. Severo-Kavkazskij region. Serija: Obshhestvennye nauki. 2021. No. 1 (209). P. 72–77. (In Russian).

2. Burn W. L. The general election of 1761 at Ayr // The English Historical Review. 1937. Vol. 52. No. 205. P.103–109.

3. Cockburn H. Life of lord Jeffrey: with a selection from his correspondence. Edinburgh: Adam and Charles Black, 1852. Vol. 1. 435 p.

4. Cowan E. J., Finlay R. Scotland since 1688: struggle for a nation. New York: Barnes and Noble, 2000. 192 p.

5. Ferguson J. Making interest in Scottish county elections // The Scottish Historical Review. The Scottish Historical Review. 1947. Vol. 26, No. 102, Part 2. P. 119–133.

6. Ferguson W. Dingwall Burgh politics and the parliamentary franchise in the eighteenth century // Scottish Historial Review. 1959. Vol. 38. No. 126. Part 2. P. 89–108.

7. Furber H. Henry Dundas, First Viscount Melville, 1741–1811, Political Manager of Scotland, Statesman, Administrator of British India. London: Oxford university press, 1931. 331 p.

8. Graham, George (1730–1801), of Kinross House, Kinross. URL: http://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/volume/1790-1820/member/graham-george-1730-1801 (Accessed: 18.09.2021).

9. Hansard’s parliamentary debates. Parliamentary reform bill for Scotland. Second reading. 23 September 1831. URL: https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1831/sep/23/parliamentary-reform-bill-for-scotland (Accessed: 18.09.2021).

10. Lovat Fraser J. A. Henry Dundas, Viscount Melville. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1916. 146 p.

11. MacLeod R. C. The Western Highlands in the Eighteenth Century // The Scottish Historial Review. 1921. Vol. 19. No. 73, P. 33–48.

12. Montgomery F. A. Glasgow and the struggle for parliamentary reform, 1830–1832 // The Scottish Historical Review. 1982. Vol. 61. No. 172. P. 130–145.

13. Mundell A. Considerations upon the situation of the Elective Franchise as it respects Counties in Scotland; stated in a letter addressed to the land-owners of that part of the United Kingdom. London: John Murray, 1821. URL: https://archive.org/details/considerationsu00mundgoog/page/n6/mode/2up (Accessed: 18.09.2021).

14. Murdoch A. The Importance of Being Edinburgh: Management and Opposition in Edinburgh Politics, 1746–1784 // The Scottish Historical Review. 1983. Vol. 62. No. 173. P. 1–16.

15. Porritt E. The unreformed House of Commons; parliamentary representation before 1832. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1903.Vol 2. 584 p.

16. Report of the Proceedings at the General Meeting of the Inhabitants of Edinburgh, December 16, 1820: to consider the propriety of a petition to his Majesty to dismiss his present ministers. Edinburgh; London, 1820. 40 p.

17. Scottish historical documents / Ed. by G. Donaldson. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1970. 287 p.

18. Sinclair J. General report of Scotland: statistical tables, or, result of the inquiries regarding the geographical, agricultural, and political state of Scotland. URL: https://archive.org/details/generalreportofs00sincuoft/page/102/mode/1up (Accessed: 18.09.2021).

19. Sinclair, Sir John, 1st Bt. (1754–1835), of Ulbster and Thurso Castle, Caithness. URL: http://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/volume/1790-1820/member/sinclair-sir-john-1754-1835 (Accessed: 18.09.2021).

20. Sunter R.M. Patronage and politics in Scotland, 1707–1832. Edinburgh: John Donald Publishers LTD, 1986. 254 p.

21. The constitutional history of England since the accession of George the Third / Ed. by M.T. Erskine, F. Holland. London: Longmans Green and Co, 1912. Vol. 1. 435 p.

22. The History of Parliament. Constituencies 1690–1715. URL: http://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/research/constituencies/constituencies-1690-1715 (Accessed: 18.09.2021).

23. The Statutes of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. URL: https://books.google.ru/books?id=Uq0uAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA154&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false (Accessed: 18.09.2021).

24. Trevelyan G.M. Ramillies and The Union with Scotland. London: Longmans Green and Co, 1948. 468 p.

25. Union with England Act 1707. URL: http://rahbarnes.co.uk/union/union-of-1707/union-with-england-act-1707/ (Accessed: 18.09.2021).

26. Union with Scotland. Act 1706. URL: http://rahbarnes.co.uk/union/union-of-1707/union-with-scotland-act-1706/ (Accessed: 18.09.2021).

27. View of the political state of Scotland in the last century: a confidential report on the political opinions, family connections, or personal circumstances of the 2662 county voters in 1788 / ed. by A. Elphinstone. Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1887. 360 p.


Review

For citations:


Mukhin M.A. The essence of electoral struggle in the Scottish counties during the elections to the house of commons of the United Kingdom (1707–1832). Humanities and law research. 2022;9(2):244-249. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37493/2409-1030.2022.2.10

Views: 180


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2409-1030 (Print)