PREDICATE AS A STRUCTURE-FORMING AND FUNCTIONAL-SEMANTIC COMPONENT OF A SEMANTIC-SYNTACTIC FRAME
https://doi.org/10.37493/2409-1030.2021.4.24
Abstract
The article actualizes the theoretical foundations that allow us to consider the predicate as the main organizing semantic element of the semantic-syntactic frame, reviews the features of the functioning of predicates within frames. The predicate should be considered both as the structural and semantic center of the sentence, and as a structure-forming element of the semantic-syntactic frame. The article also provides a rationale for the usage of the term nuclear predicate in relation to the most multi-valued components of the first level of terminals, in which the main events, states, actions of the semantic-syntactic frame are described in a general way. . The nuclear predicate is included in a macro-proposition or nuclear proposition, in which the main events, states, and actions of the semantic-syntactic frame are described in a general way.
The study of nuclear predicates is intended to supplement the understanding of the semantics of frames as the structural and semantic basis of the literary narrative.
As a part of the study, we had found that the nuclear predicate is the organizing semantic center of the frame in its semantic-syntactic representation. It is a part of the nuclear frame proposition or macro proposition and occupies the upper node (terminal) of the frame. The nuclear predicate in its semantics contains a structural description of the frame at the level of its upper terminals, since it has a standard set of valences, each of which can be considered as a slot in a certain terminal of the frame.
To achieve the maximum completeness of the description of the semantics of nuclear predicates, it is advisable to conduct it on the basis of their representation in a semantic-syntactic frame in the narrative. The idea of compiling dictionaries of frames based, among other things, on their nuclear predicates seems promising, since it is predicates that act as a natural element of the frame, linking together all its structural and semantic components.
About the Authors
S. V. Gusarenko
North-Caucasus Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor in Philology Sciences, Professor, chair of Russian as a Foreign Language, Institute of Humanities
Stavropol
I. A. Orden
North-Caucasus Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
postgraduate, Assistant, chair of Journalism, Institute of Humanities
Stavropol
References
1. Avilova N.S. Vid zaloga i semantika glagol’nogo slova (Type of verb and verb word). Moscow: Nauka, 1976. 328 p. (In Russian).
2. Apresyan Yu.D. Glagoly momental’nogo deistviya i performativy v russkom yazyke (Instant verbs and performatives in Russian) // Rusistika segodnya. Yazyk: sistema i ee funktsionirovanie. Moscow: Nauka, 1988. P. 57-78. (In Russian).
3. Apresyan Yu.D. O Moskovskoi semanticheskoi shkole (About the Moscow Semantic School) // Voprosy yazykoznaniya. Moscow: Institut russkogo yazyka im. V.V. Vinogradova RAN, 2005. № 1. P. 3-30. (In Russian).
4. Apresyan Yu.D. Semanticheskie valentnosti slova (Syntactic valences of a word) // Izbrannye trudy. Leksicheskaya semantika. Moscow: Yazyki russkoi kul’tury, 1995. Vol.1. 472 p. (In Russian).
5. Apresyan Yu.D. Fundamental’naya klassifikatsiya predikatov i sistemnaya leksikografiya (Fundamental classification of predicates and systemic lexicography) // Grammaticheskie kategorii: ierarkhii, svyazi, vzaimodeistvie. Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii. Sankt-Peterburg. 22-24 sentyabrya. St.Petersburg, 2003. (In Russian).
6. Bulygina T.V. K postroeniyu tipologii predikatov v russkom yazyke (Statics and dynamics in the semantics of the state // Semanticheskie tipy predikatov. MOScOW: Nauka, 1982. P. 7-85. (In Russian).
7. Vorkacheva E.A. Sama sushchnost’ ili priroda kazhdogo: semantika zhelaniya i rechevoe upotreblenie glagola towish (The very essence or nature of everyone: semantics of wish and the verbal use of the verb to wish) // Filologicheskie nauki. 2017. No. 3 (69). P. 68-73. (In Russian).
8. Gusarenko S.V. Propozitsiya kak komponent aktual’nogo diskursa (Proposition as a component of actual discourse) // Gumanitarnye i yuridicheskie issledovaniya. Stavropol’: NcFU publ., 2015. P. 159-164. (In Russian).
9. Didenko V.V. Vyyavlenie valentnykh slotov freima tolerantnost’ v nemetskoi, amerikanskoi i russkoi lingvokul’turakh (Revealing of potential slots of the frame tolerance (in German, American and Russian linguocultures) // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2017. No. 414. P. 5-13. (In Russian).
10. Ivanova E.V. Semanticheskaya tipologiya predikatov v sopostavitel’nom aspekte: predikaty «svoistv» v russkom i bolgarskom yazykakh (Semantic typology of predicates in a comparative aspect: predicates of «properties» in the Russian and Bulgarian languages) // Bolgarskaya rusistika. Sofiya: Obshchestvo rusistov Bolgarii, 2009. P. 5-17. (In Russian).
11. Kurakov V.I. Modelirovanie predlozheniya: itogi i perspektivy (na materiale nemetskogo yazyka) (The specificity of the frame and propositional conceptualization of mental sphere situations by the native speakers of current German) // Vestn. Volgogr. gos. un-ta. Ser. 2, Filologiya. 1998. No. 3. P. 79-83. (In Russian).
12. Kustova G.I., O.N. Lyashevskaya, E.V. Rakhilina, T.I. Reznikova, O.Yu. Shemanaeva. Zadachi i printsipy semanticheskoi razmetki leksiki v Natsional’nom korpuse russkogo yazyka (Tasks and principles of semantic markup of vocabulary in the National corpus of the Russian language) // Natsional’nyi korpus russkogo yazyka. 2006-2008. Novye rezul’taty i perspektivy. St.Petersburg, 2009. P. 215-239. (In Russian).
13. Lyashevskaya O.N., Kashkin E.V. Tipy informatsii. O leksicheskikh konstruktsiyakh v sisteme FreimBank (Types of information about lexical constructions in russianframebank) // Trudy instituta russkogo yazyka im. V.V. Vinogradova. Moscow: IRL of RAS publ., 2015. P. 464-556. (In Russian).
14. Lyashevskaya O.N., Paducheva E.V. Ontologicheskie kategorii imen emotsii (Ontological categories of emotion names) // Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya informatsiya. Series 2: Informatsionnye protsessy i sistemy. Moscow: RAS publ., 2011. No. 5. P. 23-31. (In Russian).
15. Marrokuin L.R. Semanticheskie modifikatsii predikatov v meteoinformatsionnykh tekstakh: na materiale angliiskogo yazyka (Semantic modifications of predicates in meteorological information texts: on the material of the English language): abstract of thesis. Ufa, 2011. – 19 p. (In Russian).
16. Maslov Yu.S. Vid i leksicheskoe znachenie glagola v sovremennom russkom literaturnom yazyke (The type and lexical meaning of the verb in the modern Russian literary language) // Izv. AN SSSR. Ser. lit. i yaz.. Moscow: Nauka, 1948. Vol. 7. No. 4. P. 303-316. (In Russian).
17. Maslova V.A. Vvedenie v kognitivnuyu lingvistiku (Introduction to cognitive linguistics). Moscow: Flinta; Nauka, 2006. 296 p. (In Russian).
18. Minsky M. Frejmy dlja predstavlenij znanij (A Framework for Representing Knowledge). Moscow: Energia, 1979. 152 p. (In Russian).
19. Paducheva E.V. Vyskazyvanie i ego sootnesennost’ s deistvitel’nost’yu (referentsial’nye aspekty semantiki mestoimenii) (Utterance and Its correlation with Reality: Referential Aspects of Pronoun Semantics). Moscow: Editorial, 2004. 288 p. (In Russian).
20. Paducheva E.V. Leksicheskaya aspektual’nost’ i klassifikatsiya predikatov po Maslovu-Vendleru (Lexical aspectuality and classification of predicates by Maslov-Vendler) // Voprosy yazykoznaniya. Moscow: Institut russkogo yazyka im. V.V. Vinogradova RAN, 2009. No. 6. P. 3-20. (In Russian).
21. Paducheva E.V. Semanticheskie issledovaniya: semantika vremeni i vida v russkom yazyke; semantika narrative (Semantic research: semantics of time and type in Russian; semantics of narrative). Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury, 2010. 480 p. (In Russian).
22. Pashchenko Yu.A. Predikativnost’ i predikat v lingvistike i logike (Predictivity and predicate in linguistics and logic) // Vestnik Taganrogskogo instituta imeni A.P. chekhova. Taganrog: AcTSI, 2006. P. 70-72. (In Russian).
23. Selivanova O.O. Termіnologіchna entsiklopediya (Encyclopedia of Terms). Poltava: Dokvillya-K., 2011. 844 p. (In Russian).
24. Seliverstova O.N. Semanticheskie tipy predikatov v angliiskom yazyke (Semantic types of predicates in English) // Semanticheskie tipy predikatov. Moscow: Nauka, 1982. P. 86-216. (In Russian).
25. Solodilova I.A. Sposoby kontseptualizatsii otsenki v nemetskom yazyke (na materiale nemetskoyazychnoi khudozhestvennoi prozy) (Ways of conceptualizing assessment in German (based on the material of German-language fiction): abstract of thesis. Ufa, 2014. 44 p. (In Russian).
26. Solodilova I.A. Freim kak semanticheskaya model’ v lingvodidakticheskom aspekte (Frame as a semantic model in the linguodidactic aspect) // Universitetskii kompleks kak regional’nyi tsentr obrazovaniya, nauki i kul’tury: materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-metodicheskoi konferentsii. – Orenburg: OOO IPK «Universitet», 2013. P. 2121-2126. (In Russian).
27. Ten’er L. Osnovy strukturnogo sintaksisa (Elements of structural syntax) / ed by V. G. Gak. Moscow: Progress, 1988. 656 p. (In Russian).
28. Fillmore c. Delo o padezhe (The case for case) // Novoe v zarubezhnoj lingvistike. Moscow: Progress, 1981. Issue. 10. P. 369-495. (In Russian).
29. chejf U. Znachenie i struktura jazyka (Meaning and the Structure of language). Moscow: Nauka, 1975. 432 p. (In Russian).
30. Shcherba L.V. Yazykovaya sistema i rechevaya deyatel’nost’ (Language system and speech activity). Moscow; Leningrad: Nauka, 1974. 432 p.
31. Bally c. Linguistique generale et linguistique franfaise. Paris : Librairie Ernest Leroux. 1932. 440 p.
32. Dik S. c. Functional Grammar. Amsterdam, etc.: North Holland Publ. cO., 1979. 230 p.
33. FrameNet. URL: https://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu/fndrupal/ (Accessed: 03.03.2021).
34. Lyons J. Semantics. – cambridge: cambridge Univ. Press., 1977. V. 2. P. 374-897.
35. Minsky M. The Society of Mind. – New York: Simon & Schuster, 1986. p. 308.
36. Vendler Z. Verbs and times / Z. Vendler // Linguistics in philosophy. cornell University Press, 1967. P. 97-121.
37. Weissberg J. Theoretische Grundlagen der deutschen Grammatik. Siegen, 2003.
Review
For citations:
Gusarenko S.V., Orden I.A. PREDICATE AS A STRUCTURE-FORMING AND FUNCTIONAL-SEMANTIC COMPONENT OF A SEMANTIC-SYNTACTIC FRAME. Humanities and law research. 2021;(4):193-200. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37493/2409-1030.2021.4.24
Views:
180
Email this article 