humanitieslawГуманитарные и юридические исследованияHumanities and law research2409-1030North-Caucasus Federal Universityhumanitieslaw-976Research ArticleЮРИДИЧЕСКИЕ НАУКИLEGAL SCIENCESО НЕКОТОРЫХ ОСОБЕННОСТЯХ ИНСТИТУТА ОСОБОГО МНЕНИЯDISSENTING OPINIONS: SOME PECULIARITIESДенекаИрина МихайловнаDenekaI.irina_den@list.ruФедеральный арбитражный суд Северо-Кавказского округаРоссияFederal Arbitration Court of the North Caucasus DistrictRussian Federation201407102021028791Copyright © Денека И.М., 20212021Денека И.М.Deneka I.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://humanitieslaw.ncfu.ru/jour/article/view/976

В статье рассматривается понятие особого мнения, а также развитие института особого мнения на примере англо-саксонского права.

The article deals with dissenting opinions in the courts of common law, history of dissenting, pros and cons of dissents.

особое мнениепринцип независимости судейпринцип коллегиальностиseriatimdissentsauthority of the courtprinciple of judicial independenceprinciple of collegialityReferencesHart H.L.A. The Concept of Law. 2nd ed. - Oxford, 1997.Hart H.L.A. The Concept of Law. 2nd ed. - Oxford, 1997.Brennan W.J., Jr. In Defence of Dissents // Hastings Law Journal. - Vol.50, 1999. [Electronic resource] URL: http://heinonline.org/ Hand L. The Bill of Rights. Harvard University Press, 1958. (Accessed: 08.06.2014).Brennan W.J., Jr. In Defence of Dissents // Hastings Law Journal. - Vol.50, 1999. [Electronic resource] URL: http://heinonline.org/ Hand L. The Bill of Rights. Harvard University Press, 1958. (Accessed: 08.06.2014).Henderson M.T. From Seriatim to Consensus and Back Again: A Theory of Dissent // The Supreme Court Review. - 2007. [Electronic resource] URL: http://heinonline.org/ (Accessed: 08.06.2014).Henderson M.T. From Seriatim to Consensus and Back Again: A Theory of Dissent // The Supreme Court Review. - 2007. [Electronic resource] URL: http://heinonline.org/ (Accessed: 08.06.2014).Post.R. The Supreme Court Opinion as Institutional Practice: Dissent, Legal Scholarship, and Decisionmaking in the Taft Court // Minnesota Law Review. - Vol. - 2001. - 85. [Electronic resource] URL: http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/186 (Accessed: 08.06.2014).Post.R. The Supreme Court Opinion as Institutional Practice: Dissent, Legal Scholarship, and Decisionmaking in the Taft Court // Minnesota Law Review. - Vol. - 2001. - 85. [Electronic resource] URL: http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/186 (Accessed: 08.06.2014).Дело: Burnet, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, v Coronado Oil & Gas Co., 285 US 393, 406 (1932) (Brandeis, J, dissenting) [Electronic resource] URL: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/285/393/ (Accessed: 08.06.2014).Дело: Burnet, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, v Coronado Oil & Gas Co., 285 US 393, 406 (1932) (Brandeis, J, dissenting) [Electronic resource] URL: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/285/393/ (Accessed: 08.06.2014).ZoBell K.M. Division of Opinion in the Supreme Court: A History of Judicial Disintegration // Cornell Law Quarterly. Vol.44, 1959. [Electronic resource] URL: http://heinonline.org/ (Accessed: 08.06.2014).ZoBell K.M. Division of Opinion in the Supreme Court: A History of Judicial Disintegration // Cornell Law Quarterly. Vol.44, 1959. [Electronic resource] URL: http://heinonline.org/ (Accessed: 08.06.2014).Letter from Thomas Jefferson to Justice William Johnson Monticello (Oct. 27, 1822) [Electronic resource] URL: http://let.rug.nl/usa/presidents/thomas-jefferson/letters-of-thomas-jefferson/jef1269.php (Accessed: 08.06.2014).Letter from Thomas Jefferson to Justice William Johnson Monticello (Oct. 27, 1822) [Electronic resource] URL: http://let.rug.nl/usa/presidents/thomas-jefferson/letters-of-thomas-jefferson/jef1269.php (Accessed: 08.06.2014).Кононов А.Л. Право на особое мнение //Закон. - 2006. - №11.Кононов А.Л. Право на особое мнение //Закон. - 2006. - №11.Lipez K.V. Some Reflections on Dissenting. // Maine Law Review. - 2005. - Vol. 57. [Electronic resource] URL: http://heinonline.org/ (Accessed: 08.06.2014).Lipez K.V. Some Reflections on Dissenting. // Maine Law Review. - 2005. - Vol. 57. [Electronic resource] URL: http://heinonline.org/ (Accessed: 08.06.2014).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.