humanitieslawГуманитарные и юридические исследованияHumanities and law research2409-1030North-Caucasus Federal University10.37493/2409-1030.2023.4.23humanitieslaw-1360Research ArticleФИЛОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ НАУКИPHILOLOGICAL SCIENCESЛингвокультурный аспект китайских и английских терминов родстваLinguocultural Aspect of Chinese and English Kinship Termshttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0156-2999БиньбиньХ.BingbingH.

Хуан Биньбинь, Аспирант

д. 1, ул. Пушкина, Ставрополь, 355017 

Huang Bingbing, Post-Graduate Student 

1, Pushkin St., Stavropol, 355017

bingbing.huang@yandex.comСеверо-Кавказский федеральный университетРоссияNorth-Caucasus Federal UniversityRussian Federation202316022024104722–730Copyright © Биньбинь Х., 20242024Биньбинь Х.Bingbing H.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://humanitieslaw.ncfu.ru/jour/article/view/1360Введение

Введение. Статья посвящена изучению терминосистемы родства современного английского и китайского языков в лингво-культурологическом преломлении. Хотя размер и структура семьи в разных странах различны, семья является основополагающей частью любого общества, что детерминирует важность семантического поля терминов родства в различном социальном контексте. В предпринятом исследовании затрагиваются вопросы различия между стандартным употреблением терминов родства в рамках семьи и широким их употреблением в расширенном социальном контексте. Исследуются культурные различия, лежащие в основе различий в терминосистемах родства в китайском и английском языках. Цель исследования заключается в лингвистическом описании характеристик и культурных коннотаций современных китайских и английских терминов родства.

Материалы и методы

Материалы и методы. Для достижения поставленной цели и решения исследовательских задач используются описательный метод, метод сравнительного анализа, метод контекстуального анализа характеристик английских и китайских терминов родства, систематизированных на основе обобщения ряда современных классификаций и лексикографических данных.

Анализ

Анализ. На основе проведенного сравнительного анализа лингвистических фактов в статье выявлены и обобщены сходства и принципиальные различия в употреблении английских и китайских терминов родства с точки зрения лингвокультурологии. Продемонстрировано, что факторы, влияющие на выбор терминов родства, такие как возраст, пол и контекст использования, играют разную роль в употреблении терминов родства в рассматриваемых лингвокультурах.

Результаты

Результаты. В результате предпринятого исследования сделаны выводы о специфике широкого употребления терминов родства в китайском и английском языках в их обусловленности культурными и социальными факторами; о роли многозначности и двусмысленности языковых символов китайского языка в функционировании терминов родства в китайском языке; об обусловленности лингвистической специфики терминов родства в китайском и английском языках особенностями общественного развития в Китае и в США. Научная новизна полученных результатов заключается в выявлении новых тенденций в коммуникации, а именно, модернизации и трансформации традиционных терминов родства и модификации их значений в соответствии с языковыми потребностями в современном обществе.

Introduction

Introduction. The article deals with the kinship term systems of the modern English and Chinese languages in linguocultural perspective. Although the size and the structure of a family in different countries varies, a family is a fundamental unit of any society, which determines the topicality of the study of the semantic field of kinship terms in a diverse social context. This study touches upon the matters of the difference between the standard use of kinship terms towards family members and their extensive use in a wider social context towards non-relatives. The cultural differences determining the differences in the use of kinship terms in English and Chinese are studied. The aim of the study is to provide a linguocultural description of the characteristics and cultural connotations of the modern English and Chinese kinship terms.

Materials and Methods

Materials and Methods. We use the descriptive method, the comparative analysis method, and the contextual analysis method to study English and Chinese terms collected from a variety of scientific and lexicographic sources.

Analysis

Analysis. Based on the obtained empirical data we make conclusions regarding the similarities and the differences in the use of English and Chinese kinship terms from the point of view of linguoculturology. Through the analysis of the data we demonstrate the fact that the factors which determine the use of kinship terms, such as age, gender and the overall context of the use, play a different role in the use of kinship terms in the studied linguocultures.

Results

Results. Conclusions are made regarding the specificity of the extensive use of kinship terms in Chinese and English languages, determined by a variety of cultural and social factors; regarding the role of polysemy and ambiguity of language symbols in Chinese language in the functioning of kinship terms; regarding the linguistic specificity of kinship terms in Chinese and English languages determined by the specificity of social development in China and the USA. The scientific novelty of the obtained results is seen in discovering the modern tendencies of communication related to the transformation and modification of traditional kinship terms and their meaning according to the requirements of the contemporary society and language. 

терминосистема родстваанглийский языккитайский языкширокое употребление терминов родствалингвокультуранациональная культурасопоставительный методkinship term systemEnglish languageChinese languageextensive use of kinship termslinguoculturenational culturecomparative methodReferencesBrown R, Gilman A. The pronouns of power and solidarity. Style in Language. MIT Press, 1960. P. 103–127. URL: https://www.ht.lu.se/media/utbildning/dokument/kurser/LINB30/20082/Brown&Gilman.pdf (accessed: 18.03.2023).Brown R, Gilman A. The pronouns of power and solidarity. Style in Language. MIT Press, 1960. P. 103–127. URL: https://www.ht.lu.se/media/utbildning/dokument/kurser/LINB30/20082/Brown&Gilman.pdf (accessed: 18.03.2023).Brown R, Ford M. Address in American English // The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1961. № 62(2). P. 375–385. URL: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042862 (accessed 18.03.2023).Brown R, Ford M. Address in American English // The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1961. № 62(2). P. 375–385. URL: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042862 (accessed 18.03.2023).Bi Rong H. English-Chinese kinship terms in a cultural perspective URL: https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HHZX200501018.htm (accessed: 18.03.2023).Bi Rong H. English-Chinese kinship terms in a cultural perspective URL: https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HHZX200501018.htm (accessed: 18.03.2023).Changpei L. Language and Culture URL: https://books.google.ru/books?id=msBjPwAACAAJ (accessed 18.03.2023).Changpei L. Language and Culture URL: https://books.google.ru/books?id=msBjPwAACAAJ (accessed 18.03.2023).Chen C. A Comparative Study on English and Chinese Kinship Terms and Their Translation Strategies // Theory and Practice in Language Studies.2019. Vol. 9. No. 9. P. 1237-1242. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0909.22 (accessed: 18.03.2023).Chen C. A Comparative Study on English and Chinese Kinship Terms and Their Translation Strategies // Theory and Practice in Language Studies.2019. Vol. 9. No. 9. P. 1237-1242. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0909.22 (accessed: 18.03.2023).Dora R. Exploring (un)translatability in pragmatics: Chinese and English forms of address in subtitles. URL: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ip-2023-3005/html30 (accessed: 18.03.2023).Dora R. Exploring (un)translatability in pragmatics: Chinese and English forms of address in subtitles. URL: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ip-2023-3005/html30 (accessed: 18.03.2023).Ervin-Tripp S. Sociolinguistic rules: Alteration and co-occurrence. In: Gumperz, J, Hymes D. Directions in Sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, 1972. P. 213-250. URL: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED019656.pdf (accessed: 18.03.2023).Ervin-Tripp S. Sociolinguistic rules: Alteration and co-occurrence. In: Gumperz, J, Hymes D. Directions in Sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, 1972. P. 213-250. URL: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED019656.pdf (accessed: 18.03.2023).Hongzhang F. A comparative study of the translation of the peer-relative appellations in Dream of the Red Chamber. 2008. URL: https://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10216-2010018006.htm (accessed: 18.03.2023).Hongzhang F. A comparative study of the translation of the peer-relative appellations in Dream of the Red Chamber. 2008. URL: https://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10216-2010018006.htm (accessed: 18.03.2023).Haiting W., Jun G. On the Generalization Mechanism of Chinese Kinship Term “jiejie” // English Language and Literature Studies Archives. 2022. Vol. 12. No. 2. DOI: 10.5539/ells.v12n2p74. URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ells/article/download/0/0/47123/50442 (accessed: 18.03.2023).Haiting W., Jun G. On the Generalization Mechanism of Chinese Kinship Term “jiejie” // English Language and Literature Studies Archives. 2022. Vol. 12. No. 2. DOI: 10.5539/ells.v12n2p74. URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ells/article/download/0/0/47123/50442 (accessed: 18.03.2023).Hanna B., Svenja K. Terms of Address: A Contrastive Investigation of Ongoing Changes in British, American and Indian English and in German. URL: https://brill.com/view/journals/jocp/3/1/article-p112_6.xml?language=en24 (accessed: 18.03.2023).Hanna B., Svenja K. Terms of Address: A Contrastive Investigation of Ongoing Changes in British, American and Indian English and in German. URL: https://brill.com/view/journals/jocp/3/1/article-p112_6.xml?language=en24 (accessed: 18.03.2023).Jiying C., Chuanmao T. Translation of kinship terms from Chinese into English from the perspective of relevance theory // Art Human Open Acc J. 2018. № 2(2). P. 115-126. DOI:10.15406/ahoaj.2018.02.00042.Jiying C., Chuanmao T. Translation of kinship terms from Chinese into English from the perspective of relevance theory // Art Human Open Acc J. 2018. № 2(2). P. 115-126. DOI:10.15406/ahoaj.2018.02.00042.Kroeber A. L. Anthropology: Culture Patterns & Processes. New York, Harcourt, Brace & World. 1963. URL: https://books.google.ru/books?redir_esc=y&hl=zh-CN&id=oS-OAAAAMAAJ&focus=searchwithinvolume&q= (accessed: 18.03.2023).Kroeber A. L. Anthropology: Culture Patterns & Processes. New York, Harcourt, Brace & World. 1963. URL: https://books.google.ru/books?redir_esc=y&hl=zh-CN&id=oS-OAAAAMAAJ&focus=searchwithinvolume&q= (accessed: 18.03.2023).Karimov S. D. Making Anthroponyms from Nouns by Conversion Method. International // Journal of Social Science Research and Review. 2022. № 5(5). P. 73-78. DOI: 10.47814/ijssrr.v5i5.293.Karimov S. D. Making Anthroponyms from Nouns by Conversion Method. International // Journal of Social Science Research and Review. 2022. № 5(5). P. 73-78. DOI: 10.47814/ijssrr.v5i5.293.Khalil A.A. American English and Syrian Arabic forms of address: a contrastive analysis // Philology, Theory & Practice. 2021. №14(12). P. 4032–4035. URL: https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20210622 (accessed: 18.03.2023).Khalil A.A. American English and Syrian Arabic forms of address: a contrastive analysis // Philology, Theory & Practice. 2021. №14(12). P. 4032–4035. URL: https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20210622 (accessed: 18.03.2023).Lili S. Inequality of Kinship Pronouns in Chinese English URL: https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XYNG200503040.htm (accessed 18.03.2023).Lili S. Inequality of Kinship Pronouns in Chinese English URL: https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XYNG200503040.htm (accessed 18.03.2023).Murdock G. P. Social Structure. New York: Macmillan. 1949. URL: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1949-04761-000 (accessed: 18.03.2023).Murdock G. P. Social Structure. New York: Macmillan. 1949. URL: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1949-04761-000 (accessed: 18.03.2023).Morgan L. H. Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity of the Human Family. Anthropological Publications, 1970. URL: https://books.google.ru/books/about/Systems_of_Consanguinity_and_Affinity_of.html?id=WEdLAAAAYAAJ&redir_esc=y (accessed: 18.03.2023).Morgan L. H. Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity of the Human Family. Anthropological Publications, 1970. URL: https://books.google.ru/books/about/Systems_of_Consanguinity_and_Affinity_of.html?id=WEdLAAAAYAAJ&redir_esc=y (accessed: 18.03.2023).Maoping W. A Study of Tang Dynasty Pronouns. URL: https://wap.cnki.net/touch/web/Dissertation/Article/10610-2002121291.html (accessed: 18.03.2023).Maoping W. A Study of Tang Dynasty Pronouns. URL: https://wap.cnki.net/touch/web/Dissertation/Article/10610-2002121291.html (accessed: 18.03.2023).Nicole B., Roel V. It's different with you: Contrastive perspectives on address research. URL: https://books.google.ru/books?hl=zhCN&lr=&id=6PnSEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA113&dq=Chinese+and+english+kinship+terms&ots=Mm9QoSqSVP&sig=mPy4dw5frkw9K7M527yCn7z90yc&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Chinese%20and%20english%20kinship%20terms&f=false (accessed: 18.03.2023).Nicole B., Roel V. It's different with you: Contrastive perspectives on address research. URL: https://books.google.ru/books?hl=zhCN&lr=&id=6PnSEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA113&dq=Chinese+and+english+kinship+terms&ots=Mm9QoSqSVP&sig=mPy4dw5frkw9K7M527yCn7z90yc&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Chinese%20and%20english%20kinship%20terms&f=false (accessed: 18.03.2023).Pan P. On the Generalization of Kinship Possessives. URL: http://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=1002373070 (accessed: 18.03.2023).Pan P. On the Generalization of Kinship Possessives. URL: http://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=1002373070 (accessed: 18.03.2023).Parezhati M. A Preliminary Study on the Classification of Kinship Appellations in Uyghur. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities (ICCESSH 2019). DOI: 10.2991/iccessh-19.2019.230 URL: https://www.atlantispress.com/article/125911989.pdf (accessed: 18.03.2023).Parezhati M. A Preliminary Study on the Classification of Kinship Appellations in Uyghur. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities (ICCESSH 2019). DOI: 10.2991/iccessh-19.2019.230 URL: https://www.atlantispress.com/article/125911989.pdf (accessed: 18.03.2023).Qin W. Current status of the use of Chinese kinship terms. URL: https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CDDB200502026.htm (accessed: 18.03.2023).Qin W. Current status of the use of Chinese kinship terms. URL: https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CDDB200502026.htm (accessed: 18.03.2023).Qi W. A Study of the Upper Classical Chinese Possessions. URL: https://wap.cnki.net/touch/web/Dissertation/Article/10335-2005119200.nh.html (accessed: 18.03.2023).Qi W. A Study of the Upper Classical Chinese Possessions. URL: https://wap.cnki.net/touch/web/Dissertation/Article/10335-2005119200.nh.html (accessed: 18.03.2023).Shiyun H. A study of Chinese kinship terms. URL: https://wap.cnki.net/touch/web/Dissertation/Article/10559-2001001889.nh.html (accessed: 18.03.2023).Shiyun H. A study of Chinese kinship terms. URL: https://wap.cnki.net/touch/web/Dissertation/Article/10559-2001001889.nh.html (accessed: 18.03.2023).Siwei Y. A Comparison of English and Chinese Pronouns. 2005(06). URL: https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XXSF200506040.htm (accessed 18.03.2023).Siwei Y. A Comparison of English and Chinese Pronouns. 2005(06). URL: https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XXSF200506040.htm (accessed 18.03.2023).Ting Y. A study on the generalization of Chinese kinship appellatives. URL: https://wap.cnki.net/touch/web/Dissertation/Article/101262005152970.html (accessed: 18.03.2023).Ting Y. A study on the generalization of Chinese kinship appellatives. URL: https://wap.cnki.net/touch/web/Dissertation/Article/101262005152970.html (accessed: 18.03.2023).Wen P. A Preliminary Study on the Formalization of Kinship Phrases in Mandarin. URL: https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFD2001NJSS200106016.htm (accessed: 18.03.2023).Wen P. A Preliminary Study on the Formalization of Kinship Phrases in Mandarin. URL: https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFD2001NJSS200106016.htm (accessed: 18.03.2023).Wei W. An exploration of the changes of Chinese social appellations and their cultural connotations // Modern Languages (Academic Synthesis). 2016. No 1. P. 143-145. URL: https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/ChlQZXJpb2RpY2FsQ0hJTmV3UzIwMjMwMzIxEhF4ZHl3LWN6YjIwMTYwMTA1NBoIYXp6ZWd5ejk%3D (accessed: 18.03.2023).Wei W. An exploration of the changes of Chinese social appellations and their cultural connotations // Modern Languages (Academic Synthesis). 2016. No 1. P. 143-145. URL: https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/ChlQZXJpb2RpY2FsQ0hJTmV3UzIwMjMwMzIxEhF4ZHl3LWN6YjIwMTYwMTA1NBoIYXp6ZWd5ejk%3D (accessed: 18.03.2023).Xiaoming X., Linlin C. A comparison of the classification of Chinese and English address words. URL: https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJDI200101008.htm (accessed: 18.03.2023).Xiaoming X., Linlin C. A comparison of the classification of Chinese and English address words. URL: https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJDI200101008.htm (accessed: 18.03.2023).Yande J. Semantic Features of Commonly Used Relative Words in Modern Chinese URL: https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotalSJHY199401001.htm (accessed: 18.03.2023).Yande J. Semantic Features of Commonly Used Relative Words in Modern Chinese URL: https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotalSJHY199401001.htm (accessed: 18.03.2023).Zhang L., Luo Y. A comparison of the deep cultural connotations of English and Chinese kinship terms. URL: https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ENSE200205035.htm (accessed: 18.03.2023).Zhang L., Luo Y. A comparison of the deep cultural connotations of English and Chinese kinship terms. URL: https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ENSE200205035.htm (accessed: 18.03.2023).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.